Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by kerkeslager on Sunday June 26, 2016 @03:34PM
(#11982276)
In the same vein, Orwell's Politics and the English Language[1] is an earlier observation of similar phenomena.
Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by mathattack on Monday June 27, 2016 @07:49AM
(#11985547)
I was just going to reference this. He was a master on the power of words, in both explaining it (as in your reference) and showing it in 1984 and Animal Farm.
Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by beefield on Sunday June 26, 2016 @03:49PM
(#11982348)
I recommend also Lakoff's book "Don't think of an elephant"
I thought it is a good story how rethoric and framing is used nowadays in politics.
Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by ovt on Sunday June 26, 2016 @04:49PM
(#11982634)
Lakoff and framing seemed to be in the air around 2003 or 2004, and it was a very good development.
And then everyone forgot it, or maybe were encouraged to forget it.
Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by igravious on Sunday June 26, 2016 @06:10PM
(#11983023)
Thank you for this link. More and more I am appreciating this guy's research. Have never seen him speak, what a natural speaker, very enjoyable as well as edifying.
Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by cbHXBY1D on Sunday June 26, 2016 @08:25PM
(#11983532)
Never meet your heroes. I was a big fan of his work before taking a class with him. He's the rockstar of the cogsci department at Berkeley but he's known as a massive ego and a poor professor.
Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by Dotnaught on Monday June 27, 2016 @12:19AM
(#11984199)
I took one of Lakoff's classes in 1987 and found his work to be compelling. Metaphors We Live By should be required reading.
http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/M/bo3637992...
Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by ktRolster on Monday June 27, 2016 @02:17AM
(#11984451)
He's the rockstar of the cogsci department at Berkeley but he's known as a massive ego and a poor professor.
I don't want to be harsh here, but it might be worth for you to consider that you were also a poor student.
Among other things he speaks of the think-tank-driven concerted effort to influence political support by using language invoking specific metaphors to frame important issues.
Like "Tax Relief" for dramatically reducing taxes for the rich etc.
Changed how I process political speech and pretty much any media-supported narrative.