Re:I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for...
by suryacom on Friday June 24, 2016 @04:57PM
(#11973407)
Then it is a non-starter, right? If you are starting a company, then you do have controlling stake.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for...
by mattieuga on Friday June 24, 2016 @04:59PM
(#11973432)
Just needs to be <50%
Re:I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for...
by mehta on Friday June 24, 2016 @05:05PM
(#11973472)
yeah, this is my line of thought as well. But it gets complicated when there are two co-founds in the same boat :)
Re:I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for...
by MacsHeadroom on Saturday June 25, 2016 @03:12AM
(#11975549)
[Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. I am especially not your lawyer, or anyone else's. This is not legal advise. I recommend anyone in this situation retain an attorney and ask them for legal advise on this subject.]
Get an angel check. One share in a billion leaves neither cofounder with a controlling interest.
For what it's worth, I recommend giving more like 2% for a sole angel, assuming their contribution runs little further than satisfying this control problem. But technically speaking, whatever somebody agrees to should solve the control problem.