Chasing the DAO Attacker’s Wake – A second exploit

Re:Chasing the DAO Attacker’s Wake – A second exploit by niftich on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @12:04PM (#11946713)

This reads a little sensational. The original source [1] referred to in the article looks at the issue in more detail.

[1] http://pdaian.com/blog/chasing-the-dao-attackers-wake/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chasing the DAO Attacker’s Wake – A second exploit by dang on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @12:33PM (#11946959)

Ok, we changed the url to that from https://blog.blockstack.org/solar-storm-a-serious-security-e..., and added the subtitle (of that post) to make the point clearer.

We also merged the comments from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11934472 here, since there weren't that many of them and they were about the same post.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chasing the DAO Attacker’s Wake – A second exploit by freedaemon on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @12:15PM (#11946812)

Agreed the original article does a great job. However, without the "sensational" title and simpler explanation people were not paying proper attention to this.

The original article discussed a bunch of other things as well -- everyone should read it to understand the details.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chasing the DAO Attacker’s Wake – A second exploit by curiousgal on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @12:31PM (#11946946)

By people you mean traders. This sensationalism is utterly unnecessary since the non-traders involved with Ethereum read the original article and are capable of understanding it.

[ Parent | on HN ]