Re:What Google Learned from Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team
by raldi on Thursday June 16, 2016 @10:01AM
(#11916134)
I skimmed the entire article and it just kept teasing and teasing but seemingly never revealed the promised information. If it's in there at all, it's well hidden.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What Google Learned from Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team
by tswartz on Thursday June 16, 2016 @10:37AM
(#11916392)
Here's the TL;DR
After studying over 180 google teams they didn't find any evidence that the composition of the teams mattered (i.e. friends outside of work, male/female, introverts, extroverts, intelligence). Instead what they focused on were the “group norms” or unwritten rules of how the groups interacted with each other. There were two norms that were most important to a successful group.
1) Members spoke in roughly the same proportion, what the researchers call, ‘‘equality in distribution of conversational turn-taking.’’
2) Members all had “average social sensitivity”. They could understand how other team members felt based on non-verbal queues. The underperforming teams had low sensitivity amongst the team members.