News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by SEMW on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:07PM (#11903444)
Looks great in Chrome, completely broken in Firefox: https://i.imgur.com/XRMgcHp.png.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by laumars on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @02:24PM (#11904128)
I get the same in every browser I try on Linux.

I don't get the point of this. I really don't. While far from perfect, web fonts have largely been a solved problem for a while now, so why are Google reinventing this wheel? This seems to happen all the time with the web; people taking old ideas and reinventing them again and again, in yet more bloated ways, breaking things for millions.

</grumpy rant>

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by kevinali1 on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @07:27PM (#11906193)
I don't think they're reinventing anything. Google Fonts has been offering webfonts for many years. All they did here was change the website.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by laumars on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @02:42AM (#11907538)
They've changed their "typeface rendering engine" (for want a better description). Hence why many people are now unable to see their typefaces in full when once they could.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by pmontra on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @06:45AM (#11908398)
Not every browser on Ubuntu 16.04: Firefox displays those boxes but Vivaldi, Opera and Chromium work fine.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by laumars on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @11:11AM (#11909785)
Google might have fixed some of the issues now - it was a day ago many of the bug were raised.

Just for reference, I was running ArchLinux with the Infinality font bungles.

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by pmontra on Thursday June 16, 2016 @10:41AM (#11916418)
It's fixed now. Thanks!

I didn't have the infinality fonts. I wonder what the bug was.

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by petepete on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:11PM (#11903482)
Oh, don't worry. Looks amazing in Chrome

http://i.imgur.com/FZtjj1U.png

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by AstroJetson on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @03:17PM (#11904555)
I got that with IE and Opera also. /sigh, does not bode well for using those font's if the font site is broken.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by scotth on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:21PM (#11903576)
Hey SEMW,

Sorry about that. The missing character detection can be a little finicky. Can I get a browser version / OS?

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by SEMW on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:42PM (#11903778)
Heya. Other people have already replied with versions it fails on, but for completeness, I'm on Firefox 47.0 (package version: 47.0+build3-0ubuntu0.16.04.1) on Ubuntu 16.04.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by scotth on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:45PM (#11903808)
Thanks. Looks like Linux needs some love. We'll be fixing this up asap.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by vetinari on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @03:56PM (#11904842)
FYI, same thing in firefox-47.0-4 in Fedora 23. Works fine in google-chrome-stable-51.0.2704.84-1.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by SSLy on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @04:38PM (#11905140)
Arch Linux user reporting in. Works fine in… uh… latest chromium (51.0.2704.84-1) and there are blocks in ff (47.0-1). Epiphany (3.20.2-1) horribly crashes, so bad even dev tools stop working.

I use infinality-bundle fontconfig preset.

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by jryan49 on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:27PM (#11903631)
I have same issue in Chromium 51.0.2704.84, Arch Linux. I don't have google fonts installed, is that necessary?
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by scotth on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:31PM (#11903675)
No, it is not necessary.

We'll take a look.

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by scotth on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @01:59PM (#11910856)
We didn't have a chance to test specifically on Arch, but we think we got it. Let us know if it works out.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by Keats on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:34PM (#11903702)
I have the same issue as SEMW on firefox 47 / archlinux
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by zeveb on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @03:29PM (#11904643)
I'm seeing the same issue on Firefox 45.2.0esr on Debian.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by ocdtrekkie on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:53PM (#11903876)
I'm on Edge, scotth, can you unblock my browser?
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by scotth on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @02:04PM (#11903972)
Yep. We have it in the works. Some bugs came up before launch that we didn't have a chance to get to, but it's coming.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by swah on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:27PM (#11903634)
Firefox 47 Ubuntu also looks like that. Sad.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by franciscop on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @02:50PM (#11904333)
Firefox 46 on Ubuntu 16.04. Broken both with and without AdBlock (it's many time the source of pain points).
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by jbaiter on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:34PM (#11903699)
Looks the same for me.

  * Firefox 47
  * Debian unstable
  * freetype 2.6.3
  * fontconfig 2.11
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by dajonker on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:43PM (#11903795)
Also broken in Firefox 46.0.1 on Fedora 23, running Gnome 3.18 on Xorg 1.18.3-2/Wayland 1.9.0.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by maggit on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:40PM (#11903761)
Equally broken for me on Firefox 46.0.1 on Kubuntu 16.04.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by mordocai on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:27PM (#11903636)
I have the same problem, submitted through the feedback thing so you should have a screenshot and all kinds of debug information from me.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by ISL on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @12:54AM (#11907219)
Debian testing,

Chromium 49.0.2623.87 built on Debian stretch/sid, running on Debian stretch/sid (64-bit)

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by isomorphic on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @11:20PM (#11906999)
Blank white page on Firefox 47.0, OS X El Capitan, cookies disabled.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by noir_lord on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @10:23AM (#11909499)
Fails on Xubuntu 16.04/FF47 as well.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by itaysk on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @04:30PM (#11905081)
Windows 10 latest, Edge latest
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by ryanSrich on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @04:05PM (#11904910)
They probably did:

    font-family: Something
Instead of:

    font-family: 'Something'
FF has given me this issue for years.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by runarberg on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @05:11PM (#11905345)
No, for their "Jaldi" font they simply use:

    font-family: "Jaldi script=latin rev=2"
However, they are replacing what they think is a missing glyph with an image. For example, if I type the letter "r" while keeping the DOM inspector open, I see the text node containing the letter for a moment before it is replaced with an image element:

    <img class="content-editable-missing" data-missing-character="r" src="">
This is most likely a javascript bug doing a false negative failed progressive enhancement.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by Scarbutt on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:27PM (#11903637)
No one tests on firefox anymore, is sad how firefox is being ignored more and more everyday.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by ocdtrekkie on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:59PM (#11903935)
This is a Google-specific problem. YouTube Gaming launched only working on Chrome as well. One of Google's web UI frameworks wrapped text by breaking words of any size mid-letter, if you weren't on Chrome for a while. (It would cut "the" if it felt like it during a word wrap.)

My browser, Edge, is simply blocked on Google Fonts.

It seems like Google is more and more dependent on automated testing for all if it's deployments, perhaps since everyone internally uses Chrome, nobody notices when those tests are lacking on other browsers. Google would do well to reintroduce "humans" into their development process, and maybe open their new websites once in each major browser before they push a release.

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by coldpie on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @08:44AM (#11908929)
It's been said that Chrome is the new IE. It sounds like hyperbole until you get bit by it.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by ocdtrekkie on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @09:33AM (#11909186)
This makes sense, because it has also been said that Google is the new Microsoft.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by irrational on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @04:35PM (#11905126)
In my department every developer uses a different browser as their primary browser. I only use Firefox, another only uses Chrome and another only uses Safari.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by generj on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @09:10PM (#11906569)
That's a very smart way to enforce ad-hoc testing in every browser. Probably prevents a lot of "works on my machine" issues.

I've worked for companies with no defined browser support, and other clients which required us to test in IE6-9, FF, Chrome, Safari, Mac FF, Mac Chrome, Mac Safari. It took FOREVER, so we ended up automating a lot of it.

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by icehawk219 on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @02:03PM (#11903958)
From my experience with front-end dev's it's not that they don't test in Firefox but rather they only test in Chrome. I've worked with FE devs who insisted it was unreasonable to expect them to test in all the major browsers.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by michaelmrose on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @02:31PM (#11904173)
Web devs as a group seem to be ridiculous. Note this doesn't mean everyone just a greater incidence of such.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by scotth on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @01:51PM (#11910820)
This issue should now be resolved. Thanks for the report.

Don't hesitate to add issues to https://www.github.com/google/fonts/issues if you see any other strangeness.

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by passive on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @04:01PM (#11904880)
I see the same thing in Chrome 51.0.2704.84 m, Windows 10.

I noticed my font rendering in Chrome started to be terrible a couple of days ago, so might be on me.

Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by passive on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @11:23PM (#11907014)
Hmm, Windows update + restart seems to have fixed the font rendering in general, but this page still looks the same.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by dave2000 on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @02:03PM (#11903959)
Amazingly, Firefox on Android is fine.
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by Keats on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @01:15PM (#11903521)
Pfiou I thought I had some issues with fonts again when I opened it on Firefox
Re:Google Fonts Redesigned by huhtenberg on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @03:08PM (#11904485)
Getting nothing but a blank page in Firefox.

On the console there's this:

21:07:34.420 Error: The operation is insecure. Fc@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/app_js.js:78:634 l/<.instantiate@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:36:424 Zb/v.$provide.service</<@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:37:182 l/<.invoke@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:36:321 e/<@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:33:486 l/<.invoke@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:36:321 Zb/cb<@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:38:93 d@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:35:294 e@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:36:1 l/<.invoke@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:36:111 bf/this.$get</</<@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:84:434 t@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:59:434 h@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:53:339 H/<@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:52:482 jc/c/</<@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:16:99 qf/this.$get</t.prototype.$eval@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:140:215 qf/this.$get</t.prototype.$apply@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:140:447 jc/c/<@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:16:57 l/<.invoke@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:36:321 jc/c@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:15:1 jc@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:16:274 Bc@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:15:83 @java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:309:165 b@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:183:63 Kf@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:31:474 Jf/d@java/com/google/fonts/directory/ui/angular_js.js:31:423 undefined1 angular_js.js:113:8 e/<() angular_js.js:113 df/this.$get</<() angular_js.js:85 b/<() app_js.js:157 qf/this.$get</t.prototype.$apply() angular_js.js:140 jc/c/<() angular_js.js:16 l/<.invoke() angular_js.js:36 jc/c() angular_js.js:15 jc() angular_js.js:16 Bc() angular_js.js:15 <anonymous> angular_js.js:309 b() angular_js.js:183 Kf() angular_js.js:31 Jf/d() angular_js.js:31