Re:Intel's roadmap for Optane SSDs with 1,000x performance
by olavgg on Monday June 13, 2016 @04:01PM
(#11897036)
Basically on a PCIe 3.0 x4 maximum performance is 4000GB/s, in practice this is 3200-3500MB/s. With 4k random write, you will get maximum 800.000 to 875.000 iops per second. Consumer-grade SSD's barely manage to write 500-1000 iops when sending the ATA_CMD_FLUSH command unless they are lying which is really bad.
Good read about consumer SSD performance: http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test...
Re:Intel's roadmap for Optane SSDs with 1,000x performance
by daveguy on Monday June 13, 2016 @05:19PM
(#11897747)
nitpick: iops is I/O operations per second. iops per second is redundant -- would be like FLOPS per second.
Re:Intel's roadmap for Optane SSDs with 1,000x performance
by johnm1019 on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @04:33AM
(#11900620)
and I still use ATM machines....
Re:Intel's roadmap for Optane SSDs with 1,000x performance
by erik on Monday June 13, 2016 @04:53PM
(#11897538)
Right, elsewhere in these comments it was pointed out that they are talking about a 1,000x improvement in latency vs flash memory. If they are using PCIe x4 and x2, then it seems that their throughput isn't going to be much better than existing SSDs.
Improved 4k random read and write would of course sill be a big win.
Re:Intel's roadmap for Optane SSDs with 1,000x performance
by Buge on Monday June 13, 2016 @11:55PM
(#11899654)
You made a 3 order of magnitude jump. Is that a typo?
Re:Intel's roadmap for Optane SSDs with 1,000x performance
by wmf on Monday June 13, 2016 @03:58PM
(#11897003)
I wonder if they are aggressively segmenting the market...
Intel always does this and Optane won't be any exception.
The "1,000x" claims are either at the chip level (e.g. NAND block erase vs. XPoint word write) or maybe some access pattern that is worst-case for flash. It's physically impossible to get 1,000x improvement on common access patterns.
Re:Intel's roadmap for Optane SSDs with 1,000x performance
by MustardTiger on Monday June 13, 2016 @04:41PM
(#11897436)
>The "1,000x" claims are either at the chip level
It is latency.
I wonder if they will position these as replacements for you SSD, or if they are going to pitch them as a caching layer they way they dabbled in hybrid SSD/HDD approaches.