"In March 2012, Edamaruku investigated a report that a crucifix at Our Lady of Velankanni church in Mumbai was dripping water from the feet. His research indicated that the dripping was caused by capillary action from a clogged drain.
In April 2012 the Catholic Church in Mumbai filed a complaint under Section 295(A) of the Indian Penal Code in several police stations around the city."
"Catholic leaders even disputed the scientific validity of capillary action. In the face of our documentation, they later found it prudent to modify their position, ignoring the facts and customizing it as a political weapon."
"However, the auxiliary bishop of Mumbai made official statements in the press saying that he publicly “rejoiced” and praised the “courageous” Catholic laity leaders who had filed police complaints against me."
But from here : https://youtu.be/TfJ6_ftih0s, it looks like he made disparaging remarks against the church and goaded people to raise cases against him
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by denzil_correa on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @12:05PM
(#11863185)
> In April 2012 the Catholic Church in Mumbai filed a complaint under Section 295(A) of the Indian Penal Code in several police stations around the city.
I would like source that the Catholic Church filed the complaint. The Wikipedia article leads to a source from the OP's article. Here is what the source says
> In the following weeks, three police stations in Mumbai took up blasphemy cases filed against him by Catholic groups under the notorious Section 295a of India's colonial-era penal code.
Apparently, they are some Catholic groups and not the Catholic Church. However, the real culprit here is the Catholic Secular Form (CSF)
> the Catholic Secular Forum (CSF), one of the groups that made the initial complaint, still insists it will press for prosecution should he ever return.
That said, the Catholic Church are not absolved of their blame either. The church wanted an apology - case drop barter solution
> Cardinal Oswald Gracias of Mumbai tried to broker a solution by calling upon Edamaruku to apologise and on Catholic groups to drop their case in return.
In any case, the Catholic Church does not seem to have made the complaint. However, one should still write to the Catholic Church to urge the groups like CSF to unconditionally withdraw their complaints.
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by ramgorur on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @04:55PM
(#11865587)
just saw the video, I saw nothing disparaging in his remarks, he just explained the fact, moreover, according to his statement, that particular church setups these sort of contraptions time to time, clearly to attract fools, it's very evident what is the incentive behind such schemes.
the thing is that everyone knows these churches, mazars, and temples are lucrative business institutions, especially in south asia, and they've been going on like hundreds of years.
he just stated a simple and plain truth, all blasphemy laws must be outlawed.
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by hourislate on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @12:08PM
(#11863211)
This has had to effect the Diocese financially, including the local law enforcement and politicians. I can only imagine that this statue was their poor attempt in monetizing a so called "Miracle". Hence the venomous attack and persecution of a man who's only crime was to expose the Truth. Now these people have seen their revenue stream dry up and are furious.
The Vatican itself should investigate the people in the Diocese who have instigated this sinful and hateful act. I would like to see the Pope take this matter up personally and invite this gentleman to Rome.
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by bruceb on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @12:20PM
(#11863340)
Sometimes when this story comes up what is NOT made clear is that the church complaint is not that he debunked the miracle
but that he said they where purposefully profiting off something they knew was false.
One could argue they did and it is a distinction without a difference. It is slightly different though than the spin in headlines of this story which makes it sound more outrageous. The headlines often say the legal threat is to do only with him debunking a miracle.
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by enlightenedfool on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @10:54AM
(#11862624)
"..he was getting threatening phone calls from policemen proclaiming their intention to arrest him..".
This is the disturbing thing, more than the threats he received from the foolish religious groups. An utter failure on the part of government, law and democracy.
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by sremani on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @12:10PM
(#11863235)
Or is it ? India has its own weird 'Political Correctness', you basically cannot offend religious feelings of people. If there is a group complaining, they consider it disturbance of peace or harmony. I can completely see where the Bishop told some councilor or connected guy in his congregation and some power broker trying to muzzle this dude by exerting influence on Police saying that, this guy is insulting Catholicism etc.
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by univalent on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @12:33PM
(#11863466)
So stupid. People would literally rather drink toilet water than accept the truth?
The Indian police routinely doesn't do anything to protect people that are being attacked (physically or otherwise) by large groups because politicians pressure them to do nothing (to not lose votes).
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by FeepingCreature on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @11:35AM
(#11862926)
I only know for German law, but over here the requirement is that the crime must have a basis in physical law. That is, somebody trying to murder you with a Voodoo doll cannot be held responsible, but somebody weak throwing a rock at you and falling short can, because even though the attempt had no practical chance at succeeding it was based on a legitimate physical premise.
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by nileshtrivedi on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @01:15PM
(#11863822)
He ran away after the incident with the church, not with the fakir. This is BBC being typical BBC when it comes to India.
After the TV show with the fakir, there were lively debates on TV about superstitions, science etc. I don't think he felt a threat to life, since many Hindus publicly supported him. The response in the church incident was completely different. (Not saying that the fakir incident couldn't have been a contributing factor in whether he felt safe.)
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by amalag on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @11:24AM
(#11862843)
Thankfully this article squarely places the blame on the Catholic organizations. In Indian media, Hindu groups become the scapegoat for abuses of intellectuals.
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by amalag on Thursday June 09, 2016 @03:14PM
(#11871591)
The difference is that the Catholic groups are considered mainstream and even "secular". There are many Hindu fringe groups, including the ones that occupied Mathura land for months, but they are not considered "secular".
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by djrogers on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @11:59AM
(#11863129)
There is however a significant difference between legal prosecution supported by the government, and religious zealotry. Perhaps not to the victim, but as a society it does matter.
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by dang on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @02:36PM
(#11864467)
You're presumably being downvoted because you changed the subject to the most guaranteed political, racial, and religious flamewar there is these days. That's exactly the wrong place to take a thread on Hacker News. This place is for thoughtful discussion, not political agitation, and if the Venn diagram of those two has anything in it at all, it's at most a sliver.
Agitated political discussions always turn into the same thing: ever angrier and more grandiose restatements of pre-existing positions, with no hope of arriving at the truth, and poison for the collegial atmosphere we're trying for here.
Re:The Indian Miracle-Buster Stuck in Finland
by briandear on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @01:17PM
(#11863836)
You're being downvoted because your comment suggests that Muslim immigrants are being protected from by certain governments against charges of violence. If it were local Catholic people who were having their criminal activity obscured for political purposes, then you would be upvoted. I get your point: many European governments refuse to accurately characterise criminal acts committed among Muslim refugees because they have a vested interest in keeping the citizens from having a complete picture of the effects of refugee policies in Europe.
Spending 5 minutes in Calais would make it very clear that the problem isn't as tidy and harmless as certain leftist groups would have you believe.
So you're being downvoted because there appears to be a leftist bent among many HN readers and suggesting government complacency when it comes to violence committed by 'protected' groups is punishable by downvote. Sorry, those are the rules. Anything slightly to the right of David Cameron occupies a place of contempt among this audience.
"In March 2012, Edamaruku investigated a report that a crucifix at Our Lady of Velankanni church in Mumbai was dripping water from the feet. His research indicated that the dripping was caused by capillary action from a clogged drain.
In April 2012 the Catholic Church in Mumbai filed a complaint under Section 295(A) of the Indian Penal Code in several police stations around the city."
If you are Catholic, please write to the Mumbai Archdiocese to withdraw the complaint : http://www.archdioceseofbombay.org/
EDIT: Hmmm, more digging reveals a different story. From http://thehumanist.com/march-april-2013/blasphemy-free-speec...
"Catholic leaders even disputed the scientific validity of capillary action. In the face of our documentation, they later found it prudent to modify their position, ignoring the facts and customizing it as a political weapon."
"However, the auxiliary bishop of Mumbai made official statements in the press saying that he publicly “rejoiced” and praised the “courageous” Catholic laity leaders who had filed police complaints against me."
But from here : https://youtu.be/TfJ6_ftih0s, it looks like he made disparaging remarks against the church and goaded people to raise cases against him
I would like source that the Catholic Church filed the complaint. The Wikipedia article leads to a source from the OP's article. Here is what the source says
> In the following weeks, three police stations in Mumbai took up blasphemy cases filed against him by Catholic groups under the notorious Section 295a of India's colonial-era penal code.
Apparently, they are some Catholic groups and not the Catholic Church. However, the real culprit here is the Catholic Secular Form (CSF)
> the Catholic Secular Forum (CSF), one of the groups that made the initial complaint, still insists it will press for prosecution should he ever return.
That said, the Catholic Church are not absolved of their blame either. The church wanted an apology - case drop barter solution
> Cardinal Oswald Gracias of Mumbai tried to broker a solution by calling upon Edamaruku to apologise and on Catholic groups to drop their case in return.
In any case, the Catholic Church does not seem to have made the complaint. However, one should still write to the Catholic Church to urge the groups like CSF to unconditionally withdraw their complaints.
the thing is that everyone knows these churches, mazars, and temples are lucrative business institutions, especially in south asia, and they've been going on like hundreds of years.
he just stated a simple and plain truth, all blasphemy laws must be outlawed.
The Vatican itself should investigate the people in the Diocese who have instigated this sinful and hateful act. I would like to see the Pope take this matter up personally and invite this gentleman to Rome.
Disclosure: Catholic
One could argue they did and it is a distinction without a difference. It is slightly different though than the spin in headlines of this story which makes it sound more outrageous. The headlines often say the legal threat is to do only with him debunking a miracle.
This is the disturbing thing, more than the threats he received from the foolish religious groups. An utter failure on the part of government, law and democracy.
The lack of law enforcement in India would be her biggest barrier to achieve anything significant.
It's a failure of liberal humanistic principles, but part of the problem is that this is democracy and law in action.
After the TV show with the fakir, there were lively debates on TV about superstitions, science etc. I don't think he felt a threat to life, since many Hindus publicly supported him. The response in the church incident was completely different. (Not saying that the fakir incident couldn't have been a contributing factor in whether he felt safe.)
On BBC's India coverage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Indian_sentiment#BBC
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-09-06/news...
http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/all-pm-h...
https://twitter.com/sanaledamaruku
but can you name anyone killed for apostasy in Europe?
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/06/cologne-police-re...
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/01/its-not-only-germany-that...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/06/tensions-rise-...
Agitated political discussions always turn into the same thing: ever angrier and more grandiose restatements of pre-existing positions, with no hope of arriving at the truth, and poison for the collegial atmosphere we're trying for here.
Spending 5 minutes in Calais would make it very clear that the problem isn't as tidy and harmless as certain leftist groups would have you believe.
So you're being downvoted because there appears to be a leftist bent among many HN readers and suggesting government complacency when it comes to violence committed by 'protected' groups is punishable by downvote. Sorry, those are the rules. Anything slightly to the right of David Cameron occupies a place of contempt among this audience.