News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reimagining the future of routers by makomk on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @06:03AM (#11861157)
The obvious reason not to encode assumptions about the statistical distribution of internet traffic in your router hardware is that if the assumptions ever fail (say, because some new P2P service takes off, or video viewing becomes less centralized) your routers will fall over. He's essentially proposing to build centralization and the end of the peer-to-peer internet into routers at the hardware level. Not only that, but anyone who can generate traffic that breaks that assumption can launch a denial-of-service attack against your routers.
Re:Reimagining the future of routers by hannesgredler on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @06:09AM (#11861175)
history traffic patterns show clearly a rising in-equality/ power-law distribution. so unless that multi-year (decade) long trend reverses, forwarding lookup hierarchies are going to work even better.
Re:Reimagining the future of routers by hueving on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @06:27AM (#11861237)
That's for bandwidth. You're still screwing low volume connections.

Consider 1 million people watching netflix from the perspective of a transit provider. If you're just looking at bandwidth you can obviously prioritize lookups to netflix servers. But then you have 1 million streams to different client IP addresses throughout the Internet. Each on its own will be a small fraction of the bandwidth, so are you going to punish them all? Not much gain from lookup hierarchies there.

Re:Reimagining the future of routers by hannesgredler on Thursday June 09, 2016 @12:03PM (#11870273)
netflix caches are serving millions of subscribers using a thousands to ten-thousands of prefixes, well below 100K. their caches are highly regionalized so its no practical problem.