hannesgredler
Re:Reimagining the future of routers
on Thursday June 09, 2016 @12:03PM (#11870273)
netflix caches are serving millions of subscribers using a thousands to ten-thousands of prefixes, well below 100K.
their caches are highly regionalized so its no practical problem.
Re:Reimagining the future of routers
on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @11:58PM (#11867453)
Its a 3TBits/s chipset from Broadcom
https://www.broadcom.com/products/ethernet-communication-and...
Re:Reimagining the future of routers
on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @11:55PM (#11867438)
we started integrating it in March. Arguable the compile chain is a bit heavy weight, but the code is very structured, easy to extend and a clean architecture. - Dave Barach and the VPP crew were very quick answering questions we have.
BTW Snabb is cool, but VPP is more feature complete.
Re:Reimagining the future of routers
on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @10:17AM (#11862400)
thanks, i have taken the liberty to C&P your explanation into the blog.
Re:Reimagining the future of routers
on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @06:09AM (#11861175)
history traffic patterns show clearly a rising in-equality/ power-law distribution. so unless that multi-year (decade) long trend reverses, forwarding lookup hierarchies are going to work even better.
Re:Reimagining the future of routers
on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @06:04AM (#11861159)
where theory hits reality is when those whiteboxes and their routing-stacks encounter the 600K routes coming from 40 different exits. still no viable solution out there today-
quagga, bird, any ?
Re:Reimagining the future of routers
on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @05:58AM (#11861141)
good guess :-) - our MLP (minimum lovable product) is BGP and IS-IS along with a VPP based software forwarding module.
Re:Reimagining the future of routers
on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @05:55AM (#11861128)
apologies ! - get them constantly wrong in german and so do i in english.
Re:Reimagining the future of routers
on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @05:52AM (#11861121)
your reasoning is correct (the path latency gets higer) its just that you got the final numbers wrong ;-)
on modern software forwarding core (fd.io/VPP and DPDK) you can forward with a sub 100us latency. so your total latency ends up being roughly 1.7ms "slower".
have a look at this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T66BTHnENY8