How big an issue is the nausea problem for VR products?

Re:How big an issue is the nausea problem for VR products? by imaginenore on Sunday May 29, 2016 @10:21PM (#11799208)

10000x5000 displays will take decades. That's a factor of 6 compared to 4K. We don't even have graphic cards that can play modern games at 4K / 120Hz, we just got there for 1080p.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How big an issue is the nausea problem for VR products? by Sephr on Sunday May 29, 2016 @10:55PM (#11799304)

> we just got there for 1080p

I've been playing modern games at 1440p 120hz since 2011. We've been at 4K and 5K 120hz-capable (on the GPU-side) for quite a while already as well.

It's hard to imagine not being able to hit >8K 120hz in under 500W once we get GPUs on the 7nm node.

Of course the actual displays aren't here yet, but the compute resources needed aren't out of reach.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How big an issue is the nausea problem for VR products? by imaginenore on Monday May 30, 2016 @02:55PM (#11802541)

I'm talking about modern games, meaning 2016, not 2011. Maybe you can play some lame (graphics wise) game at 4K 120Hz, but not the ones that are actually huge.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How big an issue is the nausea problem for VR products? by Sephr on Monday May 30, 2016 @05:06PM (#11803194)

I literally said modern games, meaning whatever is the most modern at the time, since 2011, not only at 2011.

[ Parent | on HN ]