Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by zerocrates on Thursday May 26, 2016 @04:46PM
(#11781436)
See, as ever, Florian Mueller for a... different perspective: http://www.fosspatents.com/2016/05/oracle-v-google-jury-find...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by farcical_tinpot on Thursday May 26, 2016 @05:48PM
(#11781950)
Funny how he mentions a rigged trial, which is exactly what the Supreme Court ruling was. However, they declined to hear again which could effectively mean "You got your copyrighted APIs, now fuck off".
Mueller is so discredited he doesn't have any weight at all.
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by elygre on Friday May 27, 2016 @03:58AM
(#11784541)
In which way was the Supreme Court rulling rigged?
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by farcical_tinpot on Saturday May 28, 2016 @09:03AM
(#11791489)
It was pretty obvious Oracle wanted it to go there because they hadn't the faintest idea how things actually worked. Oracle could then apply legal pressure and handwaving.
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by gpm on Thursday May 26, 2016 @05:16PM
(#11781700)
Out of curiosity, do we know if he is still being payed for this?
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by zerocrates on Thursday May 26, 2016 @06:13PM
(#11782097)
At least according to the man himself, he's not (at least not directly).
> As you can see, this blog's Oracle v. Google anti-unfair trial campaign--not affiliated with any party in any way whatsoever--is continuing.
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by bitmapbrother on Thursday May 26, 2016 @05:41PM
(#11781899)
If not directly from Oracle than indirectly.
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by elygre on Friday May 27, 2016 @03:55AM
(#11784529)
Do we have any evidence of this?
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by farcical_tinpot on Saturday May 28, 2016 @09:04AM
(#11791491)
Seriously?
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by Oletros on Thursday May 26, 2016 @04:57PM
(#11781537)
His level of insanity and hatred is beyond belief
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by kstrauser on Thursday May 26, 2016 @05:17PM
(#11781707)
No. He's a paid consultant to Oracle and Microsoft (see: http://www.businessinsider.com/oracle-to-google-which-blogge...) and his employers get their money's worth.
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by vesinisa on Thursday May 26, 2016 @07:54PM
(#11782730)
He still seems like a sociopath. Taking money to poison communities does not glorify it.
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by kstrauser on Thursday May 26, 2016 @08:59PM
(#11783109)
I didn't say he's not scummy, just that he's not insane. It's my belief that he's get paid well to say scummy things, which is rational if not tasteful.
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by jshevek on Thursday May 26, 2016 @05:37PM
(#11781864)
Your statement seemed hyperbolic until I followed the link and skimmed a handful of posts. He does indeed come across as someone consumed by hatred to the level of insanity. Why wouldn't anyone link to him? Its like linking to the Westboro baptist people in a discussion about Christian theology.
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by yohui on Thursday May 26, 2016 @06:16PM
(#11782119)
Because for those who didn't know better Müller appeared well-informed and it was convenient to cite him if he was on your side or you were writing a mainstream article and too lazy to find another source, especially after Groklaw shut down.
At least the Oracle vs. Google case revealed that he was actually a paid consultant for Oracle and Microsoft. It might be bad form to attack his character rather than his arguments, but it does save time when dealing with Müller.
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by AnimalMuppet on Thursday May 26, 2016 @05:44PM
(#11781921)
Well, IIRC he is (or at least was) an intellectual property lawyer. That may have contributed to him seeming to take personally any limitations on what can be covered by IP.
Or maybe not. Most IP lawyers are less unhinged than Muller...
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour
by physicalist on Thursday May 26, 2016 @05:12PM
(#11781669)
I'm not going to read that :-D