News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour. Parent comment

Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour by gpm on Thursday May 26, 2016 @05:16PM (#11781700)
Out of curiosity, do we know if he is still being payed for this?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour by zerocrates on Thursday May 26, 2016 @06:13PM (#11782097)
At least according to the man himself, he's not (at least not directly).

> As you can see, this blog's Oracle v. Google anti-unfair trial campaign--not affiliated with any party in any way whatsoever--is continuing.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour by bitmapbrother on Thursday May 26, 2016 @05:41PM (#11781899)
If not directly from Oracle than indirectly.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour by elygre on Friday May 27, 2016 @03:55AM (#11784529)
Do we have any evidence of this?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jury in Oracle v. Google finds in Google's favour by farcical_tinpot on Saturday May 28, 2016 @09:04AM (#11791491)
Seriously?
[ Parent | on HN ]