Re:Twitter moves away from 140 characters, ditches confusing...
by teaneedz on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @12:20PM
(#11762831)
Removing the ".@" syntax is a mistake. I don't always want to broadcast replies. I still don't understand why URLs are still included within the 140 char limit either. Can someone explain that better than the article?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Twitter moves away from 140 characters, ditches confusing...
by ecesena on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @12:39PM
(#11763015)
Urls where fixed to 22, then 23, lately 24 chars. It's the length of the actual shortened url.
I've been working with people helping social media for a bit, and one common issue in preparing a list of tweets to schedule is making sure the length is ok. So you end up with silly xls files where you have a url column, a text column, etc. and weird formulas to compute the size.
I think Twitter just wants to simplify the life. You can send 140 chars of text/comment. Mentions, urls, images, etc. are not counted because normal people aren't counting like that.
Re:Twitter moves away from 140 characters, ditches confusing...
by apetresc on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @12:48PM
(#11763111)
He was asking why URLs ARE still being counted as part of the length – Twitter seems to have excluded everything except for those. Your reply demonstrates how arbitrary that distinction is :)
Re:Twitter moves away from 140 characters, ditches confusing...
by alexizamerican on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @12:38PM
(#11762997)
From the blog, replies aren't broadcasted. Only new tweets that use "@" are broadcasted.
Re:Twitter moves away from 140 characters, ditches confusing...
by lutz on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @12:46PM
(#11763094)
What they mean is that .@ isn't getting removed -- by default your replies won't be broadcast to everyone (same rules apply as always) -- but since you no longer see the leading @mentions, you physically cannot do .@ on the tweet. The right way to do it going forward will be a retweet on your own tweet.