News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:By Losing Uber, Austin Is No Longer a Tech Capital by rigobert_slim on Thursday May 12, 2016 @02:02PM (#11685435)
"By Disabling Ad Blockers, Forbes Can No Longer Pretend To Be a Tech Magazine"
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:By Losing Uber, Austin Is No Longer a Tech Capital by ChuckMcM on Thursday May 12, 2016 @06:44PM (#11687389)
Actually the more telling thing is that it isn't "Ad blockers" it is "Privacy Enhancers" the only thing I've got running is Privacy Badger and Forbes won't let me in, so that is the end of my online relationship with Forbes.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:By Losing Uber, Austin Is No Longer a Tech Capital by progressive_dad on Thursday May 12, 2016 @04:06PM (#11686341)
I can't believe I'm saying this, but hacker news needs to take a lesson from what reddit is doing about this.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:By Losing Uber, Austin Is No Longer a Tech Capital by sheraz on Thursday May 12, 2016 @01:23PM (#11685162)
Did you hear that Austin?

Dell, ibm, Motorola, nvidia, amd, spiceworks, homeaway, capital factory, all you guys and girls.... Pack your shit.

Forbes has spoken.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:By Losing Uber, Austin Is No Longer a Tech Capital by tn13 on Thursday May 12, 2016 @01:44PM (#11685311)
True that. I do not want to live in a city where I cant access Uber with the same ease as my current city.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:By Losing Uber, Austin Is No Longer a Tech Capital by kernelbandwidth on Thursday May 12, 2016 @03:32PM (#11686090)
Wat.

I didn't realize Uber was the Tech Capital Kingmaker.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:By Losing Uber, Austin Is No Longer a Tech Capital by angersock on Thursday May 12, 2016 @01:18PM (#11685116)
Wonder how much Uber paid for this piece.
[ Parent | on HN ]