News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Introducing unlimited private repositories. Parent comment

Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by antihero on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @10:33AM (#11675630)
If $8 is a big deal per user, how little are you paying the poor bastards?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by NetStrikeForce on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @12:40PM (#11676848)
I guess he's not paying his employees 900% market rate, why would he pay 900% market rate for GitHub instead of BitBucket? Just trying to point that your logic doesn't check out.

I personally like the new pricing, but as a non-paying user of GitHub and BitBucket... I'll stick to BitBucket for my private repos :) I guess they don't give a damn as I'm still not paying either :)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by parsnips on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @02:37PM (#11677986)
You believe bitbucket represents the market?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by hrez on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @04:47PM (#11679110)
Market (feature set requirements) is different for everybody. If bitbucket's features are enough for me to migrate off github it's absolutely market. 9 times cheaper at that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by NetStrikeForce on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @03:50PM (#11678639)
What's so broken in Bitbucket that's not worth at 1/9th the price of Github.com?
[ Parent | on HN ]