Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories
by LeifCarrotson on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @07:59AM
(#11674417)
Agreed. The goal should be accurate market segmentation. Students, open-source devs, and hobbyists pay little or nothing, small shops pay some, and large enterprises pay more. Collaborator count seems to do that better than most metrics.
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories
by piotrkubisa on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @02:42PM
(#11678022)
It is worth noting that GitHub organizes the Student Developer Pack[1] which comes with a Micro plan ($7 - max 5 repos). It means GitHub will offer unlimited public and private repos for 2-3 years for students who were selected.
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories
by lucasnemeth on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @08:02AM
(#11674431)
It says you will be able to add a few collaborators. So I think it will be very similar in the end.
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories
by maaaats on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @09:20AM
(#11674973)
Except that you have to pay for GitHub.
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories
by mcphage on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @09:59AM
(#11675300)
Which I already was. Now I'm paying less, and getting more.
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories
by maaaats on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @12:20PM
(#11676674)
But since they now are limiting the number of contributors to your private repos, you might as well use BitBucket for free.
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories
by mcphage on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @03:48PM
(#11678623)
I do, some? When I bumped up against the repo limit in GitHub, and didn't want to increase my account size. But it always felt like a cheap knock-off, so I don't spend much time there; generally I'd clear out an older repo, or just bump up my account.
I get my private repos free, but I can only work with 5 people on them before I have to start paying.