News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tell HN: Apply HN apology and revision by cperciva on Friday May 06, 2016 @11:30PM (#11648263)
Yes, that definitely needs to be clearer. Given the context of "wisdom of the crowd vs. wisdom of YC", I interpreted the sole criterion to be "YC will benefit by making this investment"; it seems that many people took it instead as "who do we want YC to give $20k to", which is a very different question...
Re:Tell HN: Apply HN apology and revision by danieltillett on Friday May 06, 2016 @11:35PM (#11648278)
The mere fact of who won suggests that you and I were in the minority on this. Most of the problems Dan and Kevin have suffered is due to most people not thinking of what is best for YC.
Re:Tell HN: Apply HN apology and revision by cperciva on Saturday May 07, 2016 @12:03AM (#11648341)
I agree that we were probably in the minority, but statistically speaking it doesn't immediately follow: Votes for "who do you want YC to give money to" may have been far more concentrated than votes for "who will YC benefit by investing in". I don't know the total number of people who voted; if most people only voted for one or two submissions, then the pinboard-voters would be in the minority.
Re:Tell HN: Apply HN apology and revision by danieltillett on Saturday May 07, 2016 @12:50AM (#11648447)
Only YC knows the answer to this. I would not be surprised to learn that the votes were split into a large pool of people that voted for Pinboard only and another large pool that voted for multiple applications. All I know for sure is they were not voting for mine :)