But, the use case is to ensure that the config data is available on all nodes....high availability. So, for example, sharding isn't wanted or needed.
It was difficult, however, to get my arms around the whole "actor model", and understand how to use ActorDB in this relatively simple deployment.
Long story short, is there some reference, or dead simple example of a "single actor" deployment with a small number of tables?
On the surface, it seems analogous to "CREATE DATABASE" / "USE DATABASE", but then the examples show applications using multiple actors...which wouldn't be typical (one app / multiple databases). So, it seems clear the idea is multiple actors within a single app, but what drives the choice of what the actors are?
If the documentation started with some deeper explanation of actors, it might be easier to follow...as is, it jumps into actor syntax, creation, etc, without the reader really knowing what one is first.
I do get that this might be unique to me...I'm just not grocking the concept.
If you're dropbox/evernote/wunderlist, an actor would be a user account.
If you're a payment processor, every payment would be an actor.
If you're a messaging app, an actor would again be a user. If you have user groups, then every group would also be an actor.
For your use case. An actor would be configuration for an app. If you have multiple apps (or services), they would have their own actors.
Best way to solve a problem is to avoid it.