Serializable, Lockless, Distributed: Isolation in CockroachDB

Re:Serializable, Lockless, Distributed: Isolation in Cockroa... by tyingq on Thursday May 05, 2016 @10:23AM (#11636332)

It's basically trying to figure out what the purpose of an "actor" is, and what it means in terms of schema design. I can't tell if I'm supposed to use multiple actors because it adds some kind of resilience, or performance, or something else?

On the surface, it seems analogous to "CREATE DATABASE" / "USE DATABASE", but then the examples show applications using multiple actors...which wouldn't be typical (one app / multiple databases). So, it seems clear the idea is multiple actors within a single app, but what drives the choice of what the actors are?

If the documentation started with some deeper explanation of actors, it might be easier to follow...as is, it jumps into actor syntax, creation, etc, without the reader really knowing what one is first.

I do get that this might be unique to me...I'm just not grocking the concept.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Serializable, Lockless, Distributed: Isolation in Cockroa... by biokoda on Thursday May 05, 2016 @10:46AM (#11636526)

If you're an email host, an actor would be an email account.

If you're dropbox/evernote/wunderlist, an actor would be a user account.

If you're a payment processor, every payment would be an actor.

If you're a messaging app, an actor would again be a user. If you have user groups, then every group would also be an actor.

For your use case. An actor would be configuration for an app. If you have multiple apps (or services), they would have their own actors.

[ Parent | on HN ]