Re:Japan's Growing Poverty Defies Glib Explanations
by _Codemonkeyism on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:05AM
(#11579607)
Following this line of thought I would assume America is chasing Europe on their imperialist fancy, Europe (modern) those of the British, the British chasing Romes fancies, Rome those of the Greeks, the Greeks those of the Egyptians (and Persians?) and the Egyptians those of Sumer. This probably goes on though noone left writings before the Sumerians (but my knowledge is fague here).
I would also assume the invasions e.g. of Korea by Japanese before 1853 where not imperialist by intention.
Re:Japan's Growing Poverty Defies Glib Explanations
by nihonde on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:25AM
(#11579734)
Great point about Toyotomi Hideyoshi's attempt to conquer Korean and China! I guess the legacy of the Edo period was a kind of reset on that ambition, because the country was closed and not looking for a fight. I would say it was actually the failure of the shogunate to stand up to Commodore Perry that ended Edo and kicked off the outward-looking Meiji.
I'm no expert in this area, but I enjoy learning about it.
Re:Japan's Growing Poverty Defies Glib Explanations
by jazzyk on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @09:58AM
(#11580458)
What about the post-Meiji period?
The attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 was just a misunderstood act of extending an olive branch?
Re:Japan's Growing Poverty Defies Glib Explanations
by nihonde on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @10:24AM
(#11580670)
(Again my views only.) I think it was a direct reaction to the aggression of 1853. It was preceded by posturing/maneuvering in the South Pacific if I'm not mistaken. To be clear, I don't think it was justified or proportionate, but I do think those events were closely linked in that Japan saw Americans as encroaching on their sovereignty and an imminent threat from the "East".
Re:Japan's Growing Poverty Defies Glib Explanations
by SEJeff on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @10:43AM
(#11580823)
Much like the Norsemen were misunderstood by the Celts/Gaels in Ireland (whom they slaughtered)
Re:Japan's Growing Poverty Defies Glib Explanations
by pessimizer on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @09:42AM
(#11580325)
In the cases of America and the British, and Rome and the Greeks, this was explicitly true.
As for Europe, it's not a country and doesn't move as a unit. Different European countries were pioneers in imperialism, others were latecomers, others were mostly shut out and ended up doing more desperate, brutal invasions in less appealing places.
Re:Japan's Growing Poverty Defies Glib Explanations
by nihonde on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @10:27AM
(#11580689)
There were so many peaks and valleys of European empires, it's easy to lump them into one. You're right, though——it's not fair to conflate Rome with Byzantium, Hapsburghs, Belgium, Netherlands, France, etc.
Some call it a wake up call; others call it a provocation. Reasonable men and women can disagree about it. There's no doubt that it directly led to the lowest and highest points of Japanese civilization in the 20th century, though.
I think if people looked into the context of events with more curiosity, we would ultimately all benefit from the inquiry.
(And yes, I do believe that America and much of Europe are still pursuing an imperialist agenda. Call me crazy, if you want.)