Re:A previously unnoticed property of prime numbers
by hiddencost on Monday March 14, 2016 @02:28PM
(#11284542)
"not proven true" is not the same as "proven false"
they made an observation and a conjecture. If the conjecture is proven false, it's obvious uninteresting. If the conjecture isn't proven either way, it could be argued that it's just apophenia. I'm not sure I agree, but it's not an unreasonable stance.
they made an observation and a conjecture. If the conjecture is proven false, it's obvious uninteresting. If the conjecture isn't proven either way, it could be argued that it's just apophenia. I'm not sure I agree, but it's not an unreasonable stance.