VW has the wrong product mix for North America: no trucks, no popular SUVs. They got burned with US regulation because they cheated. It's easy to imagine that they would do better as a premium brand, but there is no evidence that they have the brand or the competency. Does anyone remember the Phaeton? Google that. VW has had this fantasy before.
Source on Chrysler : http://archive.fortune.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive...
Yet, VW turned Audi around and made it into a luxury brand in the US.
The Planet Money podcast covers a little more into how they did it.
http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2012/06/15/155039824/can-l...
BMW doesn't have any trucks, and Honda didn't for a long time either. It's easy money but it's not the only way to make an auto brand.
(Fun side note: VW's minivan was a rebadged Chrysler.)
No idea if they are still that way but at least at the time a Jetta and a Corolla were not anywhere close to the same thing.
Could it be placebo effect/confirmation bias? I am not a car enthusiast but I recently bought a new one and test drove both german and asian models and I honestly couldn't tell them apart.
I drove a '99 VW until it got wrecked. I picked up a '99 Acura afterwards and immediately could feel the difference in clutch & gearbox. I now drive an '03 VW, my girlfriend an '04 Honda and I can still feel the same differences. She's mentioned it too and says she prefers the "solid" feel of my car compared to hers. I've driven VWs of every generation from MK3 to current (MK7), I've driven Chevy/Honda/Toyota/Hyundai manual transmission cars and nothing feels as tight as the VWs I've driven.
So I'm a pretty big fanboy, but I definitely feel and believe there's a difference that can be felt.
I kind of feel like automobiles are going the same way. Why pay for a mid market car from VW when you can spend another $5,000 and sit in a BMW or Mercedes? Or why spend $30,000 when you can spend $20,000 and get essentially the same thing (Jetta vs. Corolla S, for example)?