It always amazes me that rich/educated people swear a lot and poor/uneducated people swear a lot but in between (middle-class) everyone is ultra polite. At least that is what I found from the limited (as one person of course experiences cannot be very broad) set of meetings in NL/UK/US.
Makes sense though. The poor don't have anything to lose by offending someone else, and are likely the people who would be most offended by some curse words in the first place. The rich don't care because everyone else looks up to them for their money anyway, who's going to call them out? The middle class have everything to lose if the wrong person is offended by what they say.
I understand avoiding the "n-word" because of America's still ever-present latent racism, and I can kinda understand avoiding the "f-word" because of a schizophrenic attitude to sex based on Puritan "family values", but I'm still at a loss whenever I see all kinds of other letters of the alphabet pop up now and then with no indication what the speaker is actually trying to refer to.
EDIT: Apparently HN ratelimits me whenever I get downvoted. Yay for passive aggressive auto-moderation.
This wouldn't fly today, as people online will post anything, but in 1992, it literally did not get airtime or newspaper coverage because no newspaper would print it, and no TV network would even allude to it.
I one took a long taxi trip across Glasgow. The driver was cheery, amiable, very Glaswegian, and almost incomprehensible; and I'm Scottish! I could understand about 50% of everything he said, because 50% of what he said was 'fucking'. He used it as an adjective on (as far as I could tell through his accent) every noun. It seemed to be used as a flavour enhancer --- good things were fucking great; bad things were fucking awful. Rain was fucking wet, the roads were fucking slippery, as it was nighttime it was fucking dark, etc, etc. It certainly wasn't being used in its literal sense.
I'm not part of that subculture, but I didn't find it the slightest bit offensive, merely interesting and rather weird.
I feel like as a non-native speaker I must be missing a significant cultural subtext everybody else seems to be painfully aware of (similar to how someone who's never heard of racial segregation and slavery in the US would be confused why the "n-word" strikes such a nerve).
Why is it that the word is so much more offensive in the US (and England too, apparently) than, say, certain parts of Scotland or Australia?
It's similar to the word 'fanny'. In the US, it seems it means 'bum'. The word 'fannypack' would translate to 'vagina pack' in the UK, which is pretty funny to hear. The equivalent in the UK is bumbag, where bum is the non-offensive version of arse (which is ass in the US).
Or, for those offended by my slew of filth above, similar to the old chips-crisps problem. American Chips = British Crisps. British Chips = American Fries.
A cunt is loosely defined as a horrible person. To say "he's a proper cunt" is to say "I really don't like him" or "he is deliberately unpleasant".
[1] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Cunt+(Scottis...
Women from Glasgow certainly use that word. Just as frequently as men. That's not to say all women, or all men, but in equal proportion.