Are you sure there employment ratio are so skewed away from developers?

Dozens may be a bit of an exaggeration, but they give a big picture breakdown of their employment ratios in their annual report;

    As of December 31, 2014, we had 6,897 employees,
    consisting of 2,838 employees in engineering, product
    development and customer operations, 2,989
    employees in sales and marketing, and 1,070
    employees in general and administrative functions.

So even broadly, 60% of the company is definitely non-engineering. From a quick glance at their 10k, it looks like about 1,700 people are in the product development group, so at minimum 75% of the company is non-engineering. Whether it's 1/5 engineers or somewhere closer to 1/10, it's hard to say but it takes a lot of people to run a company, and the majority don't make 'engineer' salaries.

Thanks for doing the legwork to my throwaway remark!

Instead of a symbolic gesture, perhaps let your employees work remote and save a real amount of money (compared to token income)?

That'd be far bigger news.

And it's far bigger work, with far bigger implications and potential unintended consequences. Telling America to just get off of its collective fat asses and walk around more than once in awhile would do more than an infusion into Medicare, but Medicare money isn't nothing for the people who need it.

Ideally, the CEO could/would do more. But just passing it off as a symbolic gesture raises the question: well, if it's so symbolic -- and thus, of no real sacrifice to the CEO, then why don't all the other rich (and far richer) CEOs do it, such that this CEO's offering doesn't make news?