News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The US Air Force's plan to detonate a nuclear bomb on the... by hindenburg on Sunday February 28, 2016 @10:42PM (#11193481)
According to the article, Dr. Reiffel said, 'The Air Force wanted a mushroom cloud so large it would be visible on earth.'

That seems a very odd thing for a physicist to say, given that of course a mushroom cloud wouldn't form in a vacuum. Perhaps Dr. Reiffel was not at his best on the day of the interview?

Re:The US Air Force's plan to detonate a nuclear bomb on the... by justin_vanw on Monday February 29, 2016 @12:23AM (#11193735)
There are too many impossibilities and errors in this to even consider it as remotely factual.

- ICBMs can't reach the moon, or even anything remotely close to it

- Mushroom clouds don't form in a vacuum.

- The fact that some Air Force officer thought it would be a neat idea (if any of this is factual) does not in any way imply that it was even remotely considered by anyone with the authority to make such a decision, any more than seeing a person who works at the Apple store drinking a coke implies that Apple Inc is buying the entire CocaCola corporation.

Re:The US Air Force's plan to detonate a nuclear bomb on the... by versteegen on Monday February 29, 2016 @05:53AM (#11194727)
By "mushroom cloud" they must have meant the ball of dust thrown up by an explosion at/below the lunar surface. That is why Sagan would have suggested it as a possibility for detecting micro-organisms.
Re:The US Air Force's plan to detonate a nuclear bomb on the... by justin_vanw on Monday February 29, 2016 @07:59PM (#11200083)
But it still wouldn't make a cloud, it would just scatter dust, and each particle of dust would fall back to the moon in a ballistic trajectory (it would not last long at all).
Re:The US Air Force's plan to detonate a nuclear bomb on the... by jld89 on Monday February 29, 2016 @05:07AM (#11194558)
It was probably just a metaphor to vulgarize what he meant. They wanted a big assed bomb.