News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by bad_user on Wednesday February 24, 2016 @06:35PM (#11171137)
Given that Xamarin bought RoboVM last year and that the project went closed source and raised prices just after that, it's fair to assume that RoboVM is dead.

Also, I'm personally not happy about this. I think people on HN should know better. Besides a couple of black swans being the exceptions that confirm the rule, acquisitions is how projects die. This is because acquisitions are either defensive or acquihires. And even when done out of a genuine desire for progress, big companies end up choking these acquisitions to death, after all they weren't capable of such progress in-house, with the project members moving on after one or two years when their contract expires.

But hey, people were excited about Nokia as well.

Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by moonchrome on Wednesday February 24, 2016 @06:49PM (#11171212)
Thing is Microsoft is already developing a lot of the stuff that makes Xamarin tick in the open source under liberal licenses - a lot of the legacy Mono tech already got replaced by CoreCLR equivalents, some are in the process or will be in the future. Eg. stuff like LLILC - IL -> LLVM static compiler will make the AoT for iOS story work instead of using mono AoT - but that project is not usable right now.

Binding APIs are some work but not impossible for OSS community to replicate if the CoreCLR and friends provided a portable platform with liberal licensing - so even if Xamarin disappeared it could be replicated - but I see no reason for them to shut it down.

And the third part of Xamarin is tooling which they can roll up into their own product offering.

Basically acquihire is a good scenario in this case because Microsoft is already moving towards these areas, Xamarin brings in talent and a bridge with working tech to provide transition.

Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by vsl on Thursday February 25, 2016 @06:03AM (#11173685)
FWIW, in 2014, Microsoft bought HockeyApp. It's still actively developed and new features are being added. I expected it to die soon then, but apparently not all acquisitions, by MS in particular, end badly.
Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by shrewduser on Wednesday February 24, 2016 @07:54PM (#11171601)
android youtube and maps were all acquisitions.

i think it's confirmation bias you don't really think of all the many successful acquisitions only the bad ones stand out.

Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by hngiszmo on Wednesday February 24, 2016 @11:17PM (#11172354)
those were aquisitions by Google. Now a list of Microsoft:
Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by slg on Wednesday February 24, 2016 @11:46PM (#11172445)
There are some success stories even just limiting it to enterprise software. PowerPoint, Visio, and many products in the Dynamics family started out as acquisitions.
Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by TheLogothete on Thursday February 25, 2016 @03:53AM (#11173193)
Not to mention SQL Server.
Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by pianoben on Thursday February 25, 2016 @01:04AM (#11172659)
The Acompli (now Outlook Mobile) acquisition has gone quite nicely so far (source: am on said team). That's just one recent example; there are quite a few MS products that came on board via acquisition.
Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by jurip on Thursday February 25, 2016 @01:27AM (#11172730)
The HockeyApp acquisition hasn't caused any pain so far.
Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by JupiterMoon on Thursday February 25, 2016 @02:35AM (#11172929)
Onenote
Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by scholia on Thursday February 25, 2016 @01:25PM (#11176497)
Not bought in, I think....

"OneNote started as an email exchange between myself and Steven Sinofsky, the Senior VP for Office, Nov 27, 2000."

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/chris_pratley/archive/2004/01/30/one...

Re:Microsoft Acquires Xamarin by pori on Wednesday February 24, 2016 @07:00PM (#11171276)
True, there are projects that die, Parse is perhaps the biggest example thus far. But seeing as how Microsoft is interested in expanding it's reach in OSS, I don't see a problem. This will likely be bundled with VS (which will be pretty cool!) and possibly even open sourced itself.