Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by foxly on Friday February 19, 2016 @09:13PM
(#11138328)
Please stop posting paywalled articles on Hacker News.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by cat-dev-null on Friday February 19, 2016 @09:28PM
(#11138385)
Amen to that.
Edit: Plus, this sort of hysterical article is bunk because there's metric ftons of angel money which renders VC/IB money, sovereign wealth and public IPO moot.
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by tarr11 on Friday February 19, 2016 @10:05PM
(#11138557)
The guidelines state to post the original source. [1] They say nothing about pay walled articles.
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by elaineo on Friday February 19, 2016 @09:49PM
(#11138491)
look at the post just below this one:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11134798
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by rpgmaker on Friday February 19, 2016 @09:32PM
(#11138410)
The paywall addon I was using on firefox stopped working on it too.
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by metric10 on Friday February 19, 2016 @09:31PM
(#11138401)
Google the article's title and click on it. WSJ articles referred from Google news search are free.
edit: As reported below, try turning off your ad blocker and/or using incognito.
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by venantius on Friday February 19, 2016 @09:33PM
(#11138418)
That is no longer true.
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by venantius on Friday February 19, 2016 @09:35PM
(#11138432)
Looks like they track the number of visits you've made to the WSJ in the past. If you use an incognito window you can still use the Google search results.
>If you use an incognito window you can still use the Google search results.
Nope. This stopped working for me about a month ago.
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by ktRolster on Friday February 19, 2016 @10:10PM
(#11138573)
It depends on the article. Some of the articles it works for, others it doesn't.
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by eevilspock on Friday February 19, 2016 @09:45PM
(#11138472)
It's only no longer true if you use an ad blocker. I switched off uBlock, and links from Google and shares work again. They made some kind of change that is ad blocker sensitive relatively recently. My friend who reports for WSJ confirms.
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by misframer on Friday February 19, 2016 @09:34PM
(#11138424)
Worked for me. Are you sure?
Edit: It doesn't work when I try it in a regular tab, but it works in incognito on Chrome.
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by leeleelee on Friday February 19, 2016 @09:48PM
(#11138484)
I'm curious, does anyone consider subverting a paywall (even if it's as simple as googling the article title in incognito mode) as being akin to media pirating? At least on an ethical level.
Re:For Silicon Valley, the Hangover Begins
by ktRolster on Friday February 19, 2016 @10:09PM
(#11138570)
I don't find it unethical, but it's most likely against the law with the DMCA anti-circumvention clause. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-circumvention#Circumventi...
Also, telling people how to do it is probably against the clause also.
Most content I enjoy I'd be willing to pay for. For example, I'd be willing to pay a few bucks a month to Hacker News, if that's what it came to for support.