It's also the only practical thing to do if the status quo is against you.
Re:Harper Lee has died
by clock_tower on Friday February 19, 2016 @03:30PM
(#11136391)
I'm amazed that Gladwell didn't have more sense than that. Does he really think that someone who could fall for Communism could understand changing hearts and minds?
Re:Harper Lee has died
by TazeTSchnitzel on Friday February 19, 2016 @03:42PM
(#11136469)
Isn't that essentially an ad hominem?
Re:Harper Lee has died
by clock_tower on Friday February 19, 2016 @07:49PM
(#11137993)
Against which party? I don't trust Orwell's judgement -- fighting for POUM, and making the argument above, weren't the only errors he made -- and I don't think Gladwell should have trusted it either.
(But then, Gladwell wrote a book called _The World is Flat_ in 2000, and it was about free trade, not fundamentalism; he's not exactly someone who I look to as a paragon of good judgement either.)
POUM was anti-Fascist and anti-Stalinist. If you think it was an error to support such a party in Spain at that time, I'm afraid it says more about your judgement than Orwell's.
Re:Harper Lee has died
by clock_tower on Wednesday February 24, 2016 @09:00PM
(#11171864)
Anti-Stalinist isn't anti-Communist. (Sorry for the extremely late post, though.)
Re:Harper Lee has died
by griffinmahon on Saturday February 20, 2016 @01:55PM
(#11141338)
In addition to your misreading of Homage to Catalonia, you also misattributed -- the author you're looking for is Thomas Friedman.
Orwell didn’t think that Dickens should have written different novels; he loved Dickens. But he understood that Dickens bore the ideological marks of his time and place. His class did not see the English social order as tyrannical, worthy of being overthrown. Dickens thought that large contradictions could be tamed through small moments of justice. He believed in the power of changing hearts, and that’s what you believe in, Orwell says, if you “do not wish to endanger the status quo.”