Re:Scientists can’t agree whether salt is killing us
by blacksmith_tb on Thursday February 18, 2016 @01:01PM
(#11127760)
This seems like a fairly extreme interpretation of 'processing' - I haven't seen anything that suggests there's a nutritional difference between steel cut, rolled, or quick oats. Human beings have 'processed' their foods along these lines for more than 10,000 years, as opposed to say, making Twinkies.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Scientists can’t agree whether salt is killing us
by undersuit on Thursday February 18, 2016 @01:33PM
(#11128050)
There is a very big nutritional difference between steel cut and rolled oats compared to quick oats. The bran is removed in quick oats.
Re:Scientists can’t agree whether salt is killing us
by retbull on Thursday February 18, 2016 @01:13PM
(#11127874)
I think in the oats case not much happens nutritionally until it gets to the cheeri o's stage of processing. The only thing I could think of that steal cut might do is remove some of the fiber when the shell falls off.