Re:Introducing the B3 JIT compiler
by pjmlp on Monday February 15, 2016 @04:37PM
(#11106214)
I mean having the JVM not adopt the tooling model of Eiffel, OCaml and others where you get to choose bytecode/JIT for developing and AOT compilation for release builds.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Introducing the B3 JIT compiler
by nickpsecurity on Monday February 15, 2016 @05:11PM
(#11106438)
Oh i hear you. That makes sense. I wanted all of them to do incremental compilation or interactive development for build then AOT for deploy. We're on same page there.