News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Introducing the B3 JIT compiler. Parent comment

Re:Introducing the B3 JIT compiler by nickpsecurity on Monday February 15, 2016 @04:04PM (#11105955)
"The remark is tailored to those..."

Ahh. Ok.

"Yet if it wasn't for the VM detour of the last 20 years"

You mean the C++ and VM detours? ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing the B3 JIT compiler by pjmlp on Monday February 15, 2016 @04:37PM (#11106214)
I mean having the JVM not adopt the tooling model of Eiffel, OCaml and others where you get to choose bytecode/JIT for developing and AOT compilation for release builds.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing the B3 JIT compiler by nickpsecurity on Monday February 15, 2016 @05:11PM (#11106438)
Oh i hear you. That makes sense. I wanted all of them to do incremental compilation or interactive development for build then AOT for deploy. We're on same page there.
[ Parent | on HN ]