Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by threatofrain on Saturday February 13, 2016 @09:17PM
(#11096828)
But in your description, Facebook is simply the mediating variable, not the cause -- the cause is the unpleasantness generated by your family.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by mentat on Saturday February 13, 2016 @09:20PM
(#11096843)
Human relationships have always been about selective ignorance.
Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by mtviewdave on Sunday February 14, 2016 @01:07AM
(#11097329)
Mark Zuckerberg believes that presenting differing personas to different audiences displays "a lack of integrity"[1] and thus Facebook is deliberately engineered to encourage an individual to present their "true" self to all "friends" equally.
[1]http://www.michaelzimmer.org/2010/05/14/facebooks-zuckerberg...
Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by bottled_poe on Sunday February 14, 2016 @02:10AM
(#11097453)
> Mark Zuckerberg believes that...
Any self-respecting person should not care what comes next.
Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by ssalazar on Sunday February 14, 2016 @05:38AM
(#11097795)
I guess it's edgy to dismiss celebrity outright, but Mark Zuckerberg is the steward of one of the largest social phenomena of our time, so I should think it matters a great deal what he believes--not necessarily because we should agree, but because of the potentially significant effects of those beliefs.
Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by camillomiller on Sunday February 14, 2016 @06:48AM
(#11097921)
I agree. It's important to criticize him. Harshly. He's the harbinger of a change whose proportions are yet to be fully understand, but it's like we're all living guinea pigs of his experiment and happy to be that.
I don't see how we can be fine with putting a self-declared mildly autistic little genius in charge of defining the nature of social interactions in the new millennium. "here's what I think relationships should be like", says such child playing with his own huge money-churning game.
Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by liuhenry on Sunday February 14, 2016 @02:17AM
(#11097468)
In contrast, WeChat (which is the closest equivalent to Facebook in China) has a number of features that are specifically tailored to allow for these different social contexts. For example, comments on a post are only visible to you if you're friends with the commenter, not just the OP. [1]
[1] https://medium.com/chrysaora-weekly/three-moments-with-wecha...
Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by soperj on Sunday February 14, 2016 @02:06AM
(#11097443)
Mark also has problems functioning in the real world.
Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by walterbell on Sunday February 14, 2016 @01:12AM
(#11097336)
The act of observation changes the observed.
There are many ways to observe.
In whose interest does Facebook observe?
Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by dhj on Saturday February 13, 2016 @10:49PM
(#11097055)
Do not reveal our surveillance, Gorlock!
Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by wisty on Saturday February 13, 2016 @10:31PM
(#11097016)
It's not unusual to have plenty of friends and relatives who are great in small doses, but not so great if you're hearing from them every day.
Re:Douglas Rushkoff: I’m thinking it may be good to be off s...
by w1ntermute on Saturday February 13, 2016 @10:19PM
(#11096987)
That doesn't change the fact that no one wants to see their loved ones behaving in undesirable ways. If you abandoned anyone who behaves poorly when enabled by Facebook/alcohol/$VICE, rather than helping them, then you wouldn't be left with many friends or family.