Re:Funding Django is not an act of charity, it's an investment
by travjones on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @10:45AM
(#11066003)
Thanks for the data. I guess rails and node are "hotter," but I'm still not convinced because it appears that stackshare relies on self report (which we all know is pretty fallible). Further, selection bias could be at play in these data. For example, individuals more likely to report their stack on stackshare might be the same individuals more likely to use rails or node. Still, at least we've got some numbers.
Re:Funding Django is not an act of charity, it's an investment
by cholantesh on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @12:55PM
(#11067194)
Well, .NET is under 600, and Meteor is over 1k, which I find dubious.
Re:Funding Django is not an act of charity, it's an investment
by superuser2 on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @11:39AM
(#11066520)
Django isn't as fashionable as Rails was in its day or Node is now. I'd guess a lot more people are using it then are talking about how they use it.
Re:Funding Django is not an act of charity, it's an investment
by yask123 on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @12:13PM
(#11066853)
http://stackshare.io/android
Unreliable data IMHO
Re:Funding Django is not an act of charity, it's an investment
by aprdm on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @10:47AM
(#11066014)
what's stack share and how does it compute the numbers?
also rails has a much bigger adoption in ruby community and node in javascript community than django in the python community (I would guess).
lots of people using flask, tornado or other frameworks now a days
and for comparison:
2.2k rails http://stackshare.io/rails 2.34k node.js http://stackshare.io/nodejs