UE and Source both have much more reasonable license terms and smaller-scoped games will go with Unity unless they build their own engine.
My guess on what they are probably looking for is probably desperate indie or small-size studios that want something bigger than unity, they'll give a bunch of AWS credit to them in order to try lock them in. Even that is a long shot.
Edit: Had another read through this. Honestly I still don't see what the attraction is. There's bigger names out there with better engines and more favorable agreements.
Edit 2: Mixed up engines.
Forced/licensed integration may not be for some people, but this isn't that expensive, comparatively, in the end.
My point was basically that Amazon's pricing isn't outrageous, comparatively.
Of course Amazon wants lock-in. It's what they're selling. But we all make decisions about who we want to be married to and to what degree we want an open marriage. All of us in the game (et al) industry are "locked in" in many ways.