News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Watson for President by pjc50 on Saturday February 06, 2016 @07:54AM (#11047573)
That sounds even worse. I wouldn't trust binding public voting on pull requests on my text editor; I'd expect it to break down fairly rapidly.
Re:Watson for President by babbish on Saturday February 06, 2016 @08:03AM (#11047605)
Assign negative weights to people who submit damaging pull requests?

Insert a layer of expert representatives (akin to congresspersons) to generate the PRs?

Making the system resilient doesn't sound like anything more than another engineering problem to me.

Re:Watson for President by Cyph0n on Saturday February 06, 2016 @08:32AM (#11047689)
The nuances of politics cannot be boiled down to a Github repository. It's not as straightforward as you think it is I'm afraid.
Re:Watson for President by babbish on Saturday February 06, 2016 @09:18AM (#11047806)
Who said anything about GitHub? The situation would call for a highly specialized, custom-made solution. If you think that's impossible, please share your reasons for thinking so. Comments like yours are pure FUD and aren't in any way helpful.
Re:Watson for President by stefs on Saturday February 06, 2016 @09:15AM (#11047794)
well, how to identify "damaging" pull requests? i mean, that's what politics is.