News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

babbish

Re:Watson for President on Saturday February 06, 2016 @09:18AM (#11047806)
Who said anything about GitHub? The situation would call for a highly specialized, custom-made solution. If you think that's impossible, please share your reasons for thinking so. Comments like yours are pure FUD and aren't in any way helpful.
Re:Watson for President on Saturday February 06, 2016 @08:03AM (#11047605)
Assign negative weights to people who submit damaging pull requests?

Insert a layer of expert representatives (akin to congresspersons) to generate the PRs?

Making the system resilient doesn't sound like anything more than another engineering problem to me.

Re:Watson for President on Saturday February 06, 2016 @07:56AM (#11047578)
If that's what he said, then I agree wholeheartedly. "Garbage in, garbage out" is pretty hard to argue against.
Re:Watson for President on Saturday February 06, 2016 @07:53AM (#11047572)
Barring military secrets, perhaps, there's no reason the AI program's current state would necessarily have to be a black box. Nor would it need to be a neural network. I also disagree with the assertion that complex things cannot be vetted.
Re:Watson for President on Saturday February 06, 2016 @07:29AM (#11047488)
Would you have the same qualms if the AI's source were open and the public voted on which pull requests to accept?