Re:California Police Used Stingrays in Planes to Spy on Phones
by cmurf on Thursday January 28, 2016 @02:36AM
(#10986908)
I don't think they have to show beyond a doubt. But you're correct they have to somehow demonstrate not just that this capability exists, but that it was used on them, and that the court can provide a remedy.
This is just one example of why whistle blower protections are necessary.
Re:California Police Used Stingrays in Planes to Spy on Phones
by shiven on Thursday January 28, 2016 @10:48AM
(#10988841)
Basically, someone needs to go Snowden and publish the kitchen sink of Stingray records to allow people to even build a case and then to prove it went beyond reasonable use (if any).
This has been a problem for people (Wikipedia) suing the NSA. Despite statistical analysis showing it's probably true, there isn't any 'beyond a doubt' evidence.