Re:Google's Android Generates $31B Revenue, Oracle Says
by carussell on Thursday January 21, 2016 @08:10PM
(#10950003)
I originally wrote "implicit affirmation", but edited it out. Hope you didn't downvote the entire comment because of that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google's Android Generates $31B Revenue, Oracle Says
by magicalist on Thursday January 21, 2016 @08:26PM
(#10950079)
There's nothing to infer from a denial of a petition for certiorari, and there's certainly no precedential weight to it. And there's actually precedential weight to the fact that a denial has none :)
It is true that they implicitly affirmed the decision in this particular case, but as to the larger question of copyrightability of APIs, as I mention above, the reasoning for denial could just as easily be they didn't think this case would be a good test for that question for whatever reason.
Wikipedia cites a few cases in which the Supreme Court has explicitly stated this in [1] (see paragraph starting with "Conversely...")
Re:Google's Android Generates $31B Revenue, Oracle Says
by AnimalMuppet on Thursday January 21, 2016 @08:23PM
(#10950060)
Nope, I didn't downvote you. I think the rest of what you wrote is pretty accurate. I also don't think Google will capitulate. I think they're moving to OpenJDK to limit their downside, but I think they're doing it with the idea of fighting it out.