News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup by taurath on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @01:33PM (#10940238)
Isn't it interesting the level of monetary value we put on most written content on the web (nothing) vs the time we spend reading said valueless content? Is it truly so valueless, or is it only valueless because similar content isn't worth anything? I click on the links I click on because I think they'll have more value to me than the rest of them, but I'm still not to the threshold of reaching any monetary value, only my attention.

I wonder how well a system like reddit gold would work for webpages - if an article was particularly fascinating or insightful or entertaining I could hit a button to give them a dollar or something else (maybe I set a budget of $20 at each month so I don't over or under-pay what I "think" I value media at). If enough people did this, wouldn't this start driving quality back up? Wouldn't it suddenly be transparent the value people see in an article in dollar terms? Who would make the first Million Dollar article?

Re:Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup by amazon_not on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @02:22PM (#10940597)
What you are describing is called Flattr. It was launched in 2010 and never went anywhere, like every other micropayment service.
Re:Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup by PhasmaFelis on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @04:17PM (#10941430)
Flattr is still running and is used by more than a few major webcomics (presumably other sites as well, I've only really looked at it for webcomics).

Granted it never took off like it wanted to, but Patreon operates on a similar model and is absolutely booming right now. Several comic artists I'm aware of have been able to quit their jobs and go full-time on the strength of Patreon alone--A Ghost Story, for example. So it's definitely not true that micropayment services always fail.

Re:Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup by taurath on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @06:03PM (#10942093)
Yup,a huge amount to of my artist friends are on it. Honestly it sounds like the best option - you take the "whales" who are hyper engaged with your content and have them fund it. If the new york times had a system where you could get benefits, no ads, and some exclusive access or perhaps editorial votes for a relatively high monthly fee I'll bet they'd get a LOT of takers.
Re:Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup by rapsacnz on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @10:42PM (#10943210)
That is not correct. Blendle in the Netherlands is growing in leaps and bounds and has 250000 users who PAY to read good content. https://launch.blendle.com/
Re:Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup by taurath on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @02:48PM (#10940806)
Interesting but not surprising that it existed. Reddit gold works because they have hundreds of millions of users and it probably barely pays the bills. Many smarter people have tried tackling the problem, but I don't think drastic online economic changes can grow organically without some sort of catalyst. Maybe if a browser like the one linked in the OP could get enough of a userbase that it becomes a force.
Re:Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup by steveklabnik on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @03:42PM (#10941180)
Flattr was a product of the Pirate Bay crew; they had an audience, it just didn't work out.
Re:Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup by cgag on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @01:43PM (#10940321)
A lot of value comes from being written our of passion or a desire to share and not a desire to have me click on ads.
Re:Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup by dreamfactory2 on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @03:39PM (#10941156)
they've already got your time in an attention economy
Re:Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup by chongli on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @04:28PM (#10941503)
Isn't it interesting the level of monetary value we put on most written content on the web (nothing) vs the time we spend reading said valueless content?

Welcome to feminism. Women have done untold amounts of uncompensated labour throughout history. What is the value of all that?

Capitalism favours those whose labour has a high monetary value assigned to it. It leaves everybody else out in the cold. I find it extremely frustrating that those who have been shunted from column A into column B have resorted to crab mentality[0] instead of becoming critics of capitalism.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crab_mentality