The U.S. propaganda machinery is very strong. Even as Joe Biden's son is now involved in Ukraine's gas companies[1] right after the coup, and along the 5 billion Victoria Nuland said U.S. spent on "democratic institutions", in front of Chevron and ExxonMobil flags, with half of Ukraine in tatters and gas rationings during bitter cold winters, people in the U.S. still think their government is a force for good in the country.

Why help Ukraine with billions and not other countries that do not have gas/oil?

[1] http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27403003

What propaganda are you speaking of? Would you forbid private companies to hire whoever they like? Do you have a list of blacklisted persons like Joe Bidens son so that companies could easily check? Again the 5 billion was spent over a period of more than 20 years how is this relevant here? For a list of the many, many countries, most of them without oil, that US aid spends more money on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_foreign_aid#Reci...

Between 2009 and 2013, including when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, according to that foundation, which is based in Kiev, Ukraine. It was created by Mr. Pinchuk, whose fortune stems from a pipe-making company. He served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian Parliament and is a proponent of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.[1]

Between donations from Ukraine oligarchs to Clinton foundation, Joe Biden's son involved in Ukraine gas corporations, the hundreds of millions spend by U.S. every year in Ukraine to "build democratic institutions", stories from recruited shooters planted in Euromaidan[2], here you are, saying U.S. officials are the good guys for the Ukrainian people. If that's not effective propaganda, I don't know what is.

And if you think the above situation is fine and dandy, I think there's nothing else we can say to increase our agreement. I'm not the kind of person who would interfere with my neighbours family, because their children didn't get lunch money for school, so that I can buy their house at a foreclosure auction later in the year when they divorce, but if you're fine with the U.S. government doing that kind of behaviour, then I should not interfere with that, either.

[1]http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-charity-tapped-foreign-f...

[2]http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-31359021

Aid and help are given to other countries that aren't oil-rich, though?