"A startled CIA reported to the White House that "an unexpectedly strong surge of popular and military reaction to Prime Minister Mossadeq's government has resulted, according to the latest dispatches from Tehran, in the virtual occupation of the city by forces professing their loyalty to the Shah and to his appointed Prime Minister Zahedi."
I'm not saying US didn't get it's hands dirty, but to assume that Iran would be a peaceful, democratic country otherwise is being naive.
I make no assumptions about how peaceful and democratic any country in the Middle East would be, with or without US involvement.
>Mossadeagh, before the Shah.
When was he elected. Or if it's like the british system, then when was the parliament that appointed him, elected?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh#Appointment... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_legislative_election,_...
No, when was that government "democratically elected"?
EDIT: Removed bickering that was distracting from my real question