News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Usenet Archives by japaw on Friday January 15, 2016 @09:03AM (#10909312)
Are there any large publicly available archives of usenet one can download?

I need it for an information retrieval research project. I am aware of gmane.org, but do not think they allow bulk download.

Re:Usenet Archives by sp332 on Friday January 15, 2016 @09:38AM (#10909527)
Re:Usenet Archives by greglindahl on Friday January 15, 2016 @01:36PM (#10911136)
Re:Usenet Archives by toomuchtodo on Friday January 15, 2016 @01:17PM (#10911024)
Please use the bittorrent download option if possible. It reduces load on archive.org.
Re:Usenet Archives by greglindahl on Friday January 15, 2016 @01:34PM (#10911125)
If there are any seeds, sure. Torrents are most useful for new, big, popular items.
Re:Usenet Archives by sp332 on Friday January 15, 2016 @01:50PM (#10911258)
IA torrent files use the archive as web seeds if they have to. But if there's a spike in interest - like right now apparently - it would reduce the load. So it will still work if there are no seeds, and it will reduce load on the servers when that's possible.

Edit: this is all just to be polite, since the archive is not worried about using a ton of bandwidth.

Re:Usenet Archives by toomuchtodo on Friday January 15, 2016 @01:58PM (#10911299)
Is the code that runs the frontend of the IA open source? I'd be interested in contributing to that, so when requests for certain objects are creating excessive load, a response status code is provided to indicate so, and the alternate URI returned is a magnet link for the object.

EDIT: It appears an HTTP 303 status code accomplishes this

Re:Usenet Archives by greglindahl on Friday January 15, 2016 @02:20PM (#10911432)
503, we return the standard 503 code. Remember that most of our users don't know what BitTorrent is, and would prefer that the archive Just Worked.
Re:Usenet Archives by toomuchtodo on Friday January 15, 2016 @02:24PM (#10911471)
Right! I'm not interested in breaking the Internet Archive, and I'd expect it to move to IPFS [1] eventually (content addressable web) [2]. If/when/how that happens, I'd expect traditional http tooling to still work (curl, wget, etc), which is why I went looking for a status code that indicates an alternate path for the resource/content.

That's why my above comment kept getting edited as I did some more research. 503 is an ugly failure. 429 tells the client to back off, but it doesn't provide a fallback to still get the content. 303 does.

I thought this train of thought was in line with Brewster's blog post [2]. Apologies for the confusion!

[1] https://ipfs.io/

[2] http://brewster.kahle.org/2015/08/11/locking-the-web-open-a-...

Re:Usenet Archives by AndrewUnmuted on Friday January 15, 2016 @01:49PM (#10911242)
From the x86-64 archive:

> Actually, I'm a bit disgusted at Intel for not even _mentioning_ AMD in their documentation or their releases, so I'd almost be inclined to rename the thing as "AMD64" just to give credit where credit is due.

TIL.

Re:Usenet Archives by mrbill on Friday January 15, 2016 @10:13AM (#10909729)
YArchive is one of my favorite high-signal low-noise sites; so much that I run a mirror of it.
Re:Usenet Archives by nickpsecurity on Friday January 15, 2016 @12:53PM (#10910850)
Glad Tomte shared it as the Computers archive already had some interesting nuggets of wisdom:

http://yarchive.net/comp/index.html

Included were arguments against triple modular redundancy in favor of other models, the uses of zero registers + proposal to use them on floating-point, and Mashey's algorithm counterpoint to Knuth's work. Those are a few I found quickly that were good and non-obvious to most at some point. There's a lot of stuff on here but the links are each short for easy skimming.

Good resource.

Re:Usenet Archives by nickpsecurity on Friday January 15, 2016 @02:10PM (#10911374)
Those were some good reads. Appreciate it. The use of API naming to indicate intent for a license was particularly clever.
Re:Usenet Archives by shrewduser on Friday January 15, 2016 @11:24AM (#10910232)
is usenet still used for discussion? how is it?

i know it's used for binaries, are there any frequent usenet users around that don't use it for binaries?

Re:Usenet Archives by ksherlock on Friday January 15, 2016 @12:42PM (#10910768)
I lurk and occasionally post on a dozen or so groups.
Re:Usenet Archives by DrScump on Friday January 15, 2016 @02:30AM (#10907795)
Where's the rest of the comp. domain?
Re:Usenet Archives by to3m on Friday January 15, 2016 @08:48AM (#10909241)
The archives are not complete - it's just articles of interest to one particular person. See http://yarchive.net/about.html