Re:The big data of bad driving, and how insurers plan to tra...
by mikeash on Friday January 08, 2016 @01:14PM
(#10866899)
Agreed, the "cars become autonomous" problems are separate from the "autonomous cars means nobody owns cars anymore" ones.
I'm more optimistic about autonomy. It still seems like a crazy hard problem, but things are advancing so fast right now that it actually seems like they might get there.
But I don't see where the leap from "autonomous cars" to "shared cars" happens. The main obstacle there is simply personal: I don't think people want shared cars. People want autonomous cars (although they probably want the autonomy to be optional) so that hurdle is not a problem on that side.
Re:The big data of bad driving, and how insurers plan to tra...
by ghaff on Friday January 08, 2016 @01:48PM
(#10867189)
I suspect that given peak loads, utilizations, etc. there are pretty unfounded assumptions about the economics associated with what would in effect be robo-taxis. Drivers today make, what, $10-15 per hour? So one would need to explain to me how taking that cost alone out of the equation suddenly makes using taxis and limos in place of private auto ownership an economically sensible thing for the majority of people in the majority of places where it isn't today.
Re:The big data of bad driving, and how insurers plan to tra...
by overgryphon on Friday January 08, 2016 @05:39PM
(#10868848)
The cost of a parking space in an urban center is also a large part of the equation.
Re:The big data of bad driving, and how insurers plan to tra...
by ghaff on Friday January 08, 2016 @06:55PM
(#10869237)
The comparison is between a digital computer and an organic one (i.e. a human driver). Furthermore, one can't just assume that a car can drop a person off and head out to the suburbs to wait. That's a huge potential cost in both congestion and energy.
- Getting from, say, freeway autopilots to more or less arbitrary self-driving under a wide range of road and weather conditions without a competent human even present is going to be a lot harder IMO than a lot of people credit. I actually don't think the NIST autonomy levels are that well thought out. I can't help but think there's a bit of "and then a miracle happens" between 3 and 4.
- Peak demand is definitely an issue. It's not just commuting. Going away for a weekend has definite unidirectional patterns. There are also lots of reasons people will prefer personal vehicles, such as keeping stuff in them.