News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by akie on Friday January 08, 2016 @06:50AM (#10864243)
This is a beautiful page, but my god, is it heavy. I'm counting 171 separate requests totaling 31 Mb - excluding the videos. I've not even loaded all videos, and my total is at over 400 Mb now.... Is this acceptable now?
Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by ohitsdom on Friday January 08, 2016 @07:44AM (#10864453)
I hate the cruft on simple news articles, but I am completely fine in this case for a special feature like this. The images/videos were beautiful and all served a purpose, and it was mostly lazy-loaded. Yes some initial load time, but a very good user experience.
Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by pcurve on Friday January 08, 2016 @07:13AM (#10864313)
I was really blown away by how much care went into making it perfect on mobile view for both orientations. Each photo is positioned differently to ensure best composition.

But it does feel a but clunky and that size is rather shocking.

Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by akie on Friday January 08, 2016 @07:30AM (#10864385)
Yeah, they've done an impressive job on mobile as well. The numbers I posted are on a desktop machine. I've checked, and it seems to weigh in at only 1.1 Mb on mobile. Pretty neat.
Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by MC7447a on Friday January 08, 2016 @09:57AM (#10865239)
Text only version:

http://pastebin.com/raw/A8T4MRGD (without text blurb)

http://pastebin.com/raw/t0CG2tzg (with text blurb)

http://pastebin.com/raw/Ud4Vc2hp (python code used to extract this)

bugs (won't fix):

- text blurb is not printed for items without g-secondary-name

- character encoding is wrong

Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by amelius on Friday January 08, 2016 @08:04AM (#10864541)
> This is a beautiful page, but my god, is it heavy

I'm already looking forward to the Oculus Rift version :)

Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by Sideshow_Boob on Friday January 08, 2016 @08:51AM (#10864775)
stop trying to make Oculus Rift a thing
Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by paublyrne on Friday January 08, 2016 @08:58AM (#10864817)
Upvoted for the Mean Girls reference. Oculus Rift is going to be a real thing, though, whether we like it or not.
Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by jodrellblank on Friday January 08, 2016 @10:35AM (#10865555)
Oculus Rift's founder said that Virtual Desktop use of the Rift is "not a focus for us right now" in a Reddit AMA yesterday - https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/3zt7ul/i_am_palmer_lu...

Followed by a comment saying web browsing in a Virtual Desktop style environment on the Rift isn't very good, and can't be due to screen resolution limitations.

Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by amelius on Friday January 08, 2016 @11:11AM (#10865856)
That is unfortunate. But good to know, thanks.
Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by amelius on Friday January 08, 2016 @10:18AM (#10865422)
Just wait until you can sit behind your computer and develop stuff on a beautiful beach, and use a big screen, all embedded into the VR world.

It would sure beat the crap out of my current desktop backdrop, which is mostly covered by windows anyway :)

Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by dexterdog on Friday January 08, 2016 @11:17AM (#10865912)
Just wait until you walk into the family room in 5 years and each person is on his own headset doing his own thing. I love the immersion, but you need to retain a sense of shared experience that we have already lost with time shifting/binge watching.
Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by zokier on Friday January 08, 2016 @01:56PM (#10867245)
While 31 megs is quite a lot indeed, there is also good amount of content on the page too. I find it far more offensive when pages use couple megs for some short news article with maybe two small pictures.
Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by CaptSpify on Friday January 08, 2016 @10:39AM (#10865590)
noscript+adblock wins again! 67K for me.

To be fair, I've had to spend some time training my adblock to handle nytimes

Re:52 Places to Go in 2016 by knodi123 on Friday January 08, 2016 @10:52AM (#10865693)
care to share your black/white lists?