Re:Many See I.R.S. Penalties as More Affordable Than Health ...
by dragonwriter on Tuesday January 05, 2016 @06:06AM
(#10842598)
The federal exchanges (for which healthcare.gov is the portal) were never intended to be a good choice (or even to have to exist at all), they were in the law as a minimal fallback to be applied for states that failed to implement their own exchangees.
Re:Many See I.R.S. Penalties as More Affordable Than Health ...
by SwellJoe on Tuesday January 05, 2016 @11:31AM
(#10844094)
Yes, my "home" state is Texas, which has been extraordinarily regressive on ACA. It might be time for me to consider making another state "home".
Re:Many See I.R.S. Penalties as More Affordable Than Health ...
by briandear on Tuesday January 05, 2016 @03:31AM
(#10842074)
The traveling full time "problem" affects me as wel. When some company or another asks, "Where do you live?" My response is preceeded by an audible shrug.. I seems that many companies actually plan to come visit me and are put out when I explain that my physical location is really of no concern to them. For example, banking. If I give a Texas address and agree to Texas terms and conditions, why would it matter that I spend 11 months a year in Europe. My mail arrives, I do my transactions online.. So what's the problem? Twentieth century thinking, that's what.
Re:Many See I.R.S. Penalties as More Affordable Than Health ...
by zo1 on Tuesday January 05, 2016 @03:54AM
(#10842157)
Those are most likely regulations enforced on to the banks. By the time it gets to the low-level employee that checks/asks/confirms your address, it's probably morphed a bit, and each employee has their own interpretation of what is "okay" when it comes to addresses.
The description given matched my experience with insurers before ACA. My problem with ACA is Healthcare.gov (still). It is possible to go through the entire application process, make one mistake or fail to provide the right detail, and end up disqualified from buying insurance through Healthcare.gov (in my case, I used a mail forwarding service address, because I travel full-time). There is no do-over, no online process for correcting the problem with the application. You have to go through a protest process that involves mailing physical letters somewhere. Fuck that. I'd go back to the nightmare that is pre-ACA private insurance, before I beg some bureaucrat, by mail, for the privilege of paying too much for insurance.
Healthcare.gov got a lot of flack in the beginning for costing too much, delivering too little, and being too flakey. All of those things are still true. It's also dehumanizing.