Don't listen to me though, I could be wrong, but it's worth looking into if you're considering an HSA.
I won't say which bank it was, but it rhymes with Smells Smargo!
If you have ongoing healthcare costs then the math becomes a wash and usually sticking with a PPO type plan is the way to go.
Looking longer term I can see the HSA becoming the norm and employers will pay into that rather than offering insurance plans. At this point the exchanges should become competitive enough to drive costs down if everything happens through the exchange.
It will be interest bearing and you can tie it to bill-pay and issue mailed checks directly out of it. It's great.
Also, you can leave unused HSA funds in the account and let them grow, tax free, for future medical needs.[1]
[1] https://www.irahelp.com/slottreport/how-you-can-utilize-hsa-...
Meanwhile, you save your marginal tax rate on any dollars contributed towards future medical expenses. That's a pretty good return on your money. $5000 at 28% marginal rate knocks $1400 off your tax bill.
> The IRS allows you to deduct qualified medical expenses that exceed 10% of your adjusted gross income for the year.
He's referring to an HSA, which comes with triple tax advantages (contribute pre-tax, pay no tax on gains, and pay no tax on usage).
Also, people with high deductibles should make sure you take advantage of tax benefits, HSA for instance. The $6000 deductible may really only be a $4800 deductible once you figure in the tax deduction. If you're talking Obamacare coverage being 20% higher than the penality (I'm assuming the penalty is not tax deductible) that may end up being a wash and you're better off with the coverage.
Now consider the guy paying the $1800 penalty instead of the $2900 coverage. The coverage being effectively $2175 (considering a 25% tax break). He pays $1800 for nothing instead of $2175. Passing up $375 coverage. Again, Obamacare - pretty much a debacle as far as costs - but that guy maybe not be the wisest choice.