Comparing different schools of economic thought absolutely relates to a discussion about rational choice and fairness.
> Communism is not relevant just because we're talking about progressive taxation and that you think is simply shows you're too biased to have an intelligent conversation.
Too biased? In what direction? Have you even been able to ascertain what my position is?
> Your arrogance is sickening. You're a kid, still in college, and you're acting like no one else has heard of history, grow up and learn to engage like an adult. Have some thoughts of your own.
Do you know me? Yet you decide to attack me. Here's a few fun facts about me: I'm not a kid, I'm 30 and have been married for 4 years, have already had a successful career and am changing pace for awhile, and I'm in university because I want to be.
What I know about you - most of your replies in this thread have been one or two liners about progressiveness, with the words 'marginal utility' occasionally thrown in.
> No one is here for a history lesson from a kid who screams communism and socialism every time tax policy is brought up.
Again, just 1 question: What do you think my opinion on taxes is?
> Progressives think it's 'fair' that everyone pays what they can afford.
Which is not what progressives believe, and then you went full on communist with this little nugget
> Some people also thought "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" was fair.
And then you started pretending only you knew history.
I don't care what you position is, I'm replying to what you say, not what you think; I can't read your mind, only what you write.
> Do you know me? Yet you decide to attack me.
I don't have to know you to tell you you're behaving arrogantly, and I haven't attacked you, if you think I have, you don't know what attack means. I've criticized your bad behavior, nothing more.
> I'm not a kid, I'm 30
Still a kid to me bub.
> Again, just 1 question: What do you think my opinion on taxes is?
I know what your position is, you stated it
> I'm all for progressive taxation, wealth and inheritance tax, all of it. But I'm also not ignorant of history...
But that's not what we're talking about anymore because you can't stop being arrogant and have derailed any conversation to the point that I no longer care what you think. "But I'm also not ignorant of history", please, grow up, your superiority complex is disgusting.
But you've been breaking the HN guidelines over and over again, and I've asked you to stop many times. You need to stop categorically if you want to keep commenting here. These rules apply to everyone, and it wouldn't be fair to other users to let you get away with it.
I'd be happy to try to clarify this if you want to discuss it further, but [email protected] would be better than here.
It's funny, you're arguing for progressive taxation, but you don't understand the history behind labour movements, equal rights, welfare, socialism, etc... Or why communism is relevant in a discussion about rational choice, inequality and perceived fairness.
I do get it though - Americans have been taught to hate communism, and thus have purged an entire century of socialist philosophy from their collective thoughts.