Re:Geek behaviors present during conversations
by thaumaturgy on Tuesday January 26, 2010 @04:39PM
(#1078963)
I seriously doubt that in most social situations, HN-like discourse would be considered "interesting".
Geeks find the constant back-and-forth of corrections in dialogue to be interesting and educational. Non-geeks do not; they lose interest by about the second iteration, and will become annoyed shortly after.
Re:Geek behaviors present during conversations
by flog on Wednesday January 27, 2010 @07:35AM
(#1080355)
Maybe the non-geeks are wrong?
Re:Geek behaviors present during conversations
by thaumaturgy on Wednesday January 27, 2010 @09:38AM
(#1080564)
Typical geek response. :-) How long would you like to debate this, and to what end?
Re:Geek behaviors present during conversations
by pvg on Tuesday January 26, 2010 @04:33PM
(#1078949)
The article is about actual conversations, not HN threads. Real life interactions have to do with whether the other party perceives you're being a patronizing git, not whether you believe you have something educational to say.
Little Edit: if you think describing 'I don't agree with you' as an 'altruistic desire to educate' and single-handedly preserving the 'validity of discourse' and the 'truth and correctness of human understanding of the world' is anything short of absurdly presumptuous, you might want to re-read the linked article very carefully.
Re:Geek behaviors present during conversations
by stralep on Tuesday January 26, 2010 @04:54PM
(#1078999)
For example: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1078529
Just look at any thread on this forum: people contribute information and correct each other and it's interesting, not patronizing.