News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I analyzed 250 SaaS pricing pages by caseysoftware on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @01:55PM (#10779540)
Great points. I've also seen another pattern with per user or consumption-based systems...

When something is low enough to experiment with and still fall into the "petty cash" area, an employee can buy a little (or for a month) and test it out. If they're somewhat successful, they can expand it out to their immediate team, still with a tiny budget. As they prove out usefulness/value and expand their users/usage, obviously the cost goes up.

But by the time they have to "Get Approval" from someone really high up - like a VP or procurement group - they have X users or Y months of success. Selling it to the higher ups then becomes easier and a more likely sale.

Re:I analyzed 250 SaaS pricing pages by douche on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @02:09PM (#10779619)
That was pretty much the Yammer sales strategy, as I observed it. Infiltrate the customer by making it free and easy to sign up an organization, build a user base organically, without having to involve those controlling the purse-strings. Eventually, there's enough people using it that compliance and security becomes an issue, and the business sort of has to pay for the enterprise support to CYA.
Re:I analyzed 250 SaaS pricing pages by troels on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @04:43PM (#10780583)
Credit where credit due - I think Basecamp were one of the early ones to perfect this strategy.
Re:I analyzed 250 SaaS pricing pages by DenisM on Tuesday December 22, 2015 @07:07PM (#10781209)
It's an old hat trick. VP of MS SQL Server was telling the same story about MSSQL around 1999 at a division meeting. For on-premises products it's even more sticky.