Re:NASA official warns private sector: We’re moving on from ...
by rm_-rf_slash on Monday December 07, 2015 @04:43PM
(#10692946)
I know little of space physics, but wouldn't the additional gravity of an asteroid disrupt tidal patterns on earth?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NASA official warns private sector: We’re moving on from ...
by Pinckney on Monday December 07, 2015 @04:58PM
(#10693046)
No. Any asteroid we could reasonably capture is much too small to have any significant impact.
Re:NASA official warns private sector: We’re moving on from ...
by nerfhammer on Monday December 07, 2015 @07:33PM
(#10693944)
What if we mess it up and it comes tumbling toward earth?
Re:NASA official warns private sector: We’re moving on from ...
by personjerry on Monday December 07, 2015 @07:57PM
(#10694040)
This is the sort of thing we would verify the calculations of, many times, and consider problems ahead of time.
Re:NASA official warns private sector: We’re moving on from ...
by InclinedPlane on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @12:45AM
(#10695022)
We lack the ability to move a large enough asteroid to do any serious damage.
Re:NASA official warns private sector: We’re moving on from ...
by Pinckney on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @03:54AM
(#10695436)
Not yet, but perhaps in the near future. The National Space Society has a proposal up for capturing 99942 Apophis via gravitational slingshot, which would be fairly damaging if we managed to crash it.
Re:NASA official warns private sector: We’re moving on from ...
by 8note on Monday December 07, 2015 @08:39PM
(#10694217)
it would likely burn up on entry
Re:NASA official warns private sector: We’re moving on from ...
by slyall on Monday December 07, 2015 @05:44PM
(#10693367)
Lets put it this way. The largest asteroid in the inner Solar system, Ceres has a mass of 1.3% of the moon.
The size of asteroid we are talking about here is likely to be closer to a container ship or maybe a small hill. Perhaps 1 millionth of the size/mass of Ceres at the most.